The search of the stone of madness: notes about the process of psychiatry biologization

Authors

Abstract

Contemporary psychiatry is marked by a biologicist tendency with special use of psychotropic in the treatment of its supposed illness. In this sense, the aim of this paper is to analyze, within the historical constitution of psychiatry, its search for the organic origin of mental disorders, from Philippe Pinel’s theory of alienism and Benedict-Augustin Morel’s theory of degeneracy. Thus, inspired by the genealogical foucaultian perspective, this article intends to present clues about the way of the biologization of psychiatric speeches and practices, who arrive the 21st century in the current classification system of mental disorders, which nourishes the biomedical paradigm and promote the banalization of diagnosis and the widespread prescription of psychotropic drugs.

Keywords

History of psychiatry, Madness, Biologicism, Psychopharmacology

Author Biographies

Daniele de Andrade Ferrazza, Departamento de Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Doutora e mestre em Psicologia pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação da Universidade Estadual Paulista, Unesp/Campus de Assis-SP. Atualmente é professora de Psicologia Social da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM), Maringá/PR, Brasil. Trabalha principalmente com os seguintes temas: Psicologia Social, Políticas Públicas de Saúde, medicalização do social e produção de subjetividades.

Murilo Galvão Amancio Cruz, Instituto de Medicina Social - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Graduado em Psicologia pela Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP). Mestrando em Saúde Coletiva pelo Instituto de Medicina Social da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.

Published

2018-11-02

How to Cite

Ferrazza, D. de A., & Cruz, M. G. A. (2018). The search of the stone of madness: notes about the process of psychiatry biologization. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, 18(3), e-2157. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2157

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
583
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles