Arguments for a Postsocial and Posthumanistic Sociology

Authors

  • Fernando J. García Selgas Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to articulate and develop several arguments for a posthumanist, sociological perspective in which society is not confined within, and identified as, national space or defined as aggregation or structural determination of human beings. My first argument is a plea for a new social transition from the modern idea of association to the idea of a not human-centred assemblage, like we moved from community to society. In order make it easier to assume the social agency of objects I help to get ride of the anti-fetishism bias in social sciences and show, at the same time, how the logic of technoscience, in which researchers and scientific objects are mutually constituted, is pervading the whole social reality. Last, but not least, I undertake a brief presentation of the constructive side of posthumanism in Sociology.

 

Keywords

Posthumanist sociology, Posthumanism

Author Biography

Fernando J. García Selgas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Catedrático de Sociología de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Sus principales ámbitos de trabajo son la teoría social contemporánea, la sociología del cuerpo y la filosofía de las ciencias sociales, en los que ha publicado numerosos trabajos. Su último libro es Sobre la fluidez social: Elementos para una cartografía (CIS, 2007).

Published

2010-11-04

How to Cite

García Selgas, F. J. (2010). Arguments for a Postsocial and Posthumanistic Sociology. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, (19), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v0n19.745

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
141
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles