La psicología social de la ciencia: una revisión bibliográfica de su estado actual
Resumo
-Referências
ADAIR, R.K. (1981). Anonymous refereeing. Physics Today, 34, 13-15.
AIKENHEAD, G. S. (1985). Collective Decision Making in the Social Context of Science. Science Education, 69 (4), 453-475.
ALLIGER, G. M. and HANGES, P. G. (1983). Objectivity and Science: Reply to Kukla. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (3), 676-679.
ANNAS, G.J. (1988). Not saints but healiers: The legal duties of health care professionals in the AIDS epidemic. American0 Journal of Public Healthe, 8, 844-849.
APPELBAUM, P.S. & ROSENBAUM, A. (1989). Tarasoff and the researcher: does the duty to protect apply in the research setting? American Psychologist, 44, 885-849.
BARBER, B. (1952). Science and the Social Order. New York: Collier.
BARBER, B. (1961). Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery. Science, 134, 596-602.
BARKER, A. & PETERS, B.G. (Eds.) (1993). The Politics of Expert Advice. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
BARNETT, A.H.; AULT, R.W. & KASERMAN, D.L. (1988). The rising incidence of co-authorship in economics: Further evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 539-543.
BARON, R.A. (1981). The “Costs of deception” revisited: An openly optimistic rejoinder. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 3, 1, 8-10.
BARON, J. & HERSHEY, J.C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 569-579.
BAUMRIND, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “Behavioral study of obedience”. American Psychologist, 19, 421-423.
BAUMRIND, D. (1971). Principles of ethical conduct in the treatment of subjects: Reaction to the draft report of the Committee on Ethical Standards in Psychological Research. American Psychologist, 26, 887-896.
BAUMRIND, D. (1972). Reactions to the May 1972 draft report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Ethical Standards in Psychological research. American Psychologist, 27, 1082-1086.
BAUMRIND, D. (1975a). It neither is nor ought to be: A reply to Wallwork. In E.C. Kennedy (Ed.), Human rights and psychological research: A debate on psychology and ethics (pp. 83-102). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
BAUMRIND, D. (1975b). Metaethical and normative considerations goerning the treatment of human subjects in the behavioral sciences. In E.C. Kennedy (Ed.), Human rights and psychological research: A debate on psychology and ethics (pp. 37-68). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
BAUMRIND, D. (1978). Nature and definition of informed consent in research involving deception. In The Belmont Report: Ethicall principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0014, 23-1-23-71). Washington, DC: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
BAUMRIND, D. (1979). IRBs and social science research: The costs of deception. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 1, 6, 1-4.
BAUMRIND, D. (1985). Research Using Intentional Deception. Ethical issues revisited. American Psychologist, 40 (2), 165-174.
BAYER, R. (1985). AIDS and the gay community: Between the specter and the promise of medicine. Social Research, 52, 581-606.
BAYER, R. & GOSTIN, L. (1990). Legal and ethical issues relating to AIDS. Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization, 24, 454-468.
BAYER, R.; LEVINE, C. & MURRAY, T. (1984). Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS. IRB: A review of human subjects research, 6, 6, 1-12.
BAYER, R. & TOOMEY, K.E. (1992). HIV prevention and the two faces of partner notification: Policy, politics and ethics. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1158-1164.
BAZELON, D. L. (1982). Veils, Values, and Social Responsability. American Psychologist, 37 (2), 115-121.
BAZERMAN, C. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 361-387.
BAZERMAN, C. (1987). Codifying the social science style: The APA Publication Manual as behavioristic rheoric. In J.S. Nelson, A. Megill & D.N. McCloskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences (pp. 125-144). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
BAZERMAN, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
BEER, C. (1983). Minds and Machines: Motive for Metaphor? A Response to Boden. New Ideas Psychol., 1 (2), 117-122.
BEIT-HALLAMI, B. (1977). Curiosity, doubt and devotion: the beliefs of psychologists and the psychology of religion. In H. N. Malony (Ed.), Current perspectives in the psychology of religion, pp. 381-391. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
BEN-DAVID, J. (1971) (1984). The Scientist’s Role in society: A Comparative Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
BERGIN, A.E. (1980). Psychotherapy and religious values. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 95-105.
BERGIN, A.E. (1983). Religiosity and mental health: a critical reevaluation and meta-analysis. Professional Psychology, 14, 170-184.
BERGIN, A.E. (1991). Vlues and religious issues inpsychotherapy and mental health. American Psychologist, 46, 394-403.
BERGIN, A.E. & JENSEN, J.P. (1990). Religiosity of psychotherapists: a national survey. Psychotherapy, 27, 3-7.
BERKENCOTTER, C. & HUCKIN, T.N. (1993). You are what you cite: Novelty and intertextuality in a biologist’s experimental article. In M.R. Blyler & C. Thralls (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. 107-127). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
BERKENCOTTER, C.; HUCKIN, T.N. & ACKERMAN, J. (1991). The initiation of a graduate student into writing in a research community. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 191-215). Madison: University of wisconsin Press.
BERLIN, I. (1979). Against the current. London: Hogart.
BERRY, C. (1981). The Nobel Scientists and the Origins of Scientific Achievement. The British Journal of Sociology, 32 (3), 381-391.
BEVAN, W. (1980). On Getting in Bed With a Lion. American Psychologist, 35 (9), 779-789.
BEVAN, W. (1982). A sermon of shorts in three plus parts. American Psychologist, 37, 1303-1322.
BEYER, J. (1978). Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields. Sociological Quarterly, 19, 68-88.
BEYER, J.; LODAHL, J. & GORDON, G. (1972). The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. American Sociological Review, 37, 57-72.
BINGLE, W. H. and GASKELL, P. J. (1994). Scientific Literacy for Decisionmaking and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Science Education, 78 (2), 185-201.
BIZZELL, P. (1986). What happens when basic writers come to college? College Composition and Communication, 37, 294-245.
BLACKWELL, R. J. (1983). Scientific Discovery: The Search for New Categories. New Ideas Psychol., 1 (2), 111-115.
BLANCK, P. D. et al. (1992). Scientific Rewards and Conflicts of Ethical Choices in Human Subjects Research. American Psychologist, 47 (7), 959-965.
BLANCK, T. O. (1988). Reflections on Gergen's "Social Psychology as History" in Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14 (4), 651-663.
BLANC, P.D.; BELLACK, A.S.; ROSNOW, R.L.; ROTHERAM-BORUS, M.J. & SCHOOLER, N.R. (1992). Scientific Rewards and Conflicts of Ethical Choices in Human Subjects Research. American Psychologist, 47, 7, 959-965.
BOHME, G. (1979). Alternatives in science -alternatives to science. En H. Rose (Ed.), Counter-Movements in the Sciences. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 3 (pp. 105-125). Boston: D. Reidel.
BOOR, M. (1982). The citation empact factor: Another dubious index of journal quality. American Psychologist, 37, 975-977.
BORUCH, R.F. & CECIL, J.S. (1979). Assuring the confidentiality of research data. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
BOWEN, D.D.; PERLOFF, R. & JACOBY, J. (1972). Improving manuscript evaluation procedures. American Psychologist, 27, 221-25.
BRACKBILL, Y & KORTON, F. (1970). Journal reviewing practices: Authors’ and APA members’ suggestions for revision. American Psychologist, 25, 937-40.
BRADLEY, J.V. (1981). Pernicious publication practices. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 31-34.
BRADLEY, J.V. (1982). Editorial overkill. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 271-274.
BREIGER, R.L. (1976). Career Attributes and Network Structure: A Blockmodel Study of a Biomedical Research Specialty. American Sociological Review, 41, 117-35.
BRIDGEWATER, C.A.; BORNSTEIN, P.H. & WALKENBACH, J. (1981). Ethical issues and the assignment of publication credit. American Psychologist, 36, 524-525.
BROAD, W. & WADE, N. (1982). Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon & Schuster.
BROCK, T.C. & BECKER, L.A. (1966). “Debriefing” and susceptibility to subsequent experimental manipulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 314-323.
BROWN, H. I. (1983). Assimilation and Discovery. New Ideas Psychol., 1 (2), 89-97.
CALLON, M. (1986). Some elements of a Sociology oj translation: Domestications of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc’s Bay. In J. Law (ed) (1986). Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196-229. Keele: Sociological Review Monograph, 32. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
CAMPBELL, D.T. (1961). Conformity in psychology’s theories of acquired behavioral dispositions. In I. A. Berg & B.M. Bass (Eds.), Conformity and deviation (pp. 125-142). New York: Harper & Row.
CAMPBELL, D.T. (1979). A tribal model of the social system vehicle carrying scientific knowledge. Knowledge, 2, 191-201.
CAMPBELL, D.T. (1989). Fragments of the fragile history of psychological epistemology and theory of science. En B. Gholson, W.R. Shadish, R.A. Neimeyer & A.C. Houts (Eds.), Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 21-46). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
CAMPBELL, D.T. (1994). The Social Psychology of Scientific Validity: An Epistemological Perspective and a Personalized History. En W.R. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds), The Social Psychology of Science (pp. 124-161). New York: The Guilford Press.
CANN, C.I. & ROTHMAN, K.J. (1984). IRBs and epidemiologic research: How inappropriate restrictions hamper studies. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 6, 4, 5-7.
CECI, S.J. & PETERS, D. (1982). Peer review: A study of reliability. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44-49.
CECI, S.J. & PETERS, D. (1984). How blind is blind review? American Psychologist, 1491-1494.
CECI, S.J. & PETERS, D. (1984). Letters of reference: A naturalistic study of the effects of confidentiality. American Psychologist, 39, 29-31.
CECI, S. J., PETERS, D. & PLOTKIN, J. (1985). Human Subjects Review, Personal Values, and the Regulation of Social Science Research. American Psychologist, 40, 9, 994-1002.
CHAIKEN, S. & STANGOR, S. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575-630.
CHAMBERS, J.A. (1964). Relating personality and biographical factors to scientific creativity. Psychological Monographs, 78, (7, whole nº 584).
CHRISTAKIS, N.A. (1988). Should IRBs monitor research more strictly? IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 10, 2, 8-10.
CHURCHMAN, C.W. (1961). Prediction and Optimal Decision: Philosophical Issues of a Science of Values. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
CHURCHMAN, C.W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems. New York: Basic Books.
CICCHETI, D.V. (1979). The reliability of manuscript reviewing for the Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1979 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, pp. 596-600. Washington, D.C.: American Statistics Association.
CICCHETI, D.V. (1980). Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data. American Psychologist, 35, 300-303.
CICCHETI, D.V. (1982). On peer review: We have met the enemy and he is us. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 204.
CICCHETI, D.V. & ERON, L.D. (1979). The reliability of manuscript reviewing for ghe Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1979 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, pp. 596-600. Washington, D.C.: American Statistics Association.
CLARK, K.E. (1957). America's psychologists: A survey of a growing profession. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
CLARKE, B.L. (1964). Multiple authorship trends in scientific papers. Science, 143, 822-824.
COAN, R.W. (1979). Psychologists: Personal and theoretical pathways. New York: Irvington.
COHEN, J. (1982). The cost of IRB reviews. In R.A. Greenwald, M.K. Ryan & J.E. Mulvihill (Eds.), Human subjects research: A handbook for institutional review boards (pp. 596-600). Washington, DC: American Statistics Association.
COHEN, J. (1983). The financial costs of IRBs. Paper presented at the 90th meeting of the American Psychological Association. Anaheim, CA.
COLE, S. & COLE, J.R. (1968). Visibility and the Structural Bases of Awareness of Scientific Research. American Sociological Review, 33, 397-413.
COLE, S. & COLE, J. R. (X). Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science. American Sociological Review, xxxx, 377-390.
COLE, J.R. & COLE, S. (1973). Social stratification of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
COLE, J.R. & COLE, S. (1979). Which researcher will get the grant?. American Psychologist, 279, 575-576.
COLE, S.; COLE, J.R. & SIMON, G.A. (1981). Chance and consensus in peer review. Science, 214, 881-886.
COLE, S.; RUBIN, L. & COLE, J.R. (1977). Peer review and the support of science. Sicnetific American, 237, 34-41.
COLEMAN, J.S.; KATZ, E. & MENZEL, H. (1966). Medical innovation: A Diffusion Study. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
COLLINS, H. (1982) Knowledge, norms and rules in the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, 12, 299-309.
COMTE, A. 1853 (1975). Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. Editado por Gertrud Lenzer. New York: Harper & Row.
COX, W.M. & CATT, V. (1977). Productivity ratings of graduate programs in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 32, 793-813.
COWAN, D.H. & ADAMS, B.R. (1979). Ethical and legal considerations for IRBs: Research with medical records. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 1, 8, 1-4.
COZZENS, S.E. (1996). Autonomía y poder en la ciencia. Zona Abierta, 75/76, 133-163.
CRANDALL, R. (1978). Interrater agreement on manuscripts is not so bad!. American Psychologist, 33, 623-624.
CRANE, D. (1967). The Gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist, 32, 195-201.
CRANE, D. (1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: A Test of the ‘Invisible College’ Hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 34, 335-52.
CRANE, D. (1972). Invisible colleges. Chiago: University of Chicago Press.
CRAWFORD, S. (1970). Informal Communication among Scientists in Sleep and Dream Research. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
CRAWFORD, E. (1996). El universo de la ciencia internacional, 1880-1939. Zona Abierta, 75/76, 191-212.
CURRAN, W.J.; GOSTIN, L. & CLARK, M. (1988). Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: Legal and regulatory policy analysis. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
DANIELS, G. H. (1967). The Pure-Science Ideal and Democratic Culture. Science, 156, 1699-1705.
DANIELS, G.H. (1967). The Pure-Science Ideal and Democratic Culture. Science, 156, 1699-1705.
DECONCHY, J.P. (1982), Psychologie Sociale, Systemes sociaux et Ideologies. Quaderns de Psicologia, II, 23-50.
DEUTSCH, M. (1969). Socially Relevant Science: Reflections on Some Studies of Interpersonal Conflict. American Psychologist, 24, 1076-1092.
DICKSON, D. (1984). The New Politics of Science. Chicago: Unversity of Chicago Press.
DIESING, P. (1991). How does social science work? Reflections on practice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
DILLON, G.L. (1991). Contending rhetorics: Writing in academic disciplines. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
DRESSER, R.S. (1981). Deception research and the HHS final regulations. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 3, 4, 3-4.
DURKHEIM, E. (1938). The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
EATON, W.O. (1983). The reliability of ethical reviews: some initial empirical findings. Canadian Psychologist, 24, 14-18.
ECKHARDT,C. I., KASSINOVE, H. and EDWARDS, L. (1992). Religious Beliefs and Scientific Ideology in Psychologists: Conflicting or Coexisting Systems?. Psychological Reports, 71, 131-145.
EIDUSON, B.T. (1962). Scientists: Their psychological world. New York: Basic Books.
EIDUSON, B.T. & BECKMAN, L. (Eds). (1973). Science as a career choice: Theoretical and empirical studies. New York: Russell Sage.
ELKANA, Y. (1981). A programmatic attempt at an anthropology of knowledge. En E. Mendelsohn & Y. Elkana (Eds.), Sciences and Cultures. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 5 (pp. 1-76). Boston: D. Reidel.
ENDLER, N.S.; RUSHTON, J.P. & ROEDIGER, H.L. (1978). Productivity and scholarly impact (citations) of British, Canadian, and U.S. departments of psychology. American Psychologist, 33, 1064-1082.
FAUST, D. (1984). The limits of scientific reasoning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
FESTINGER, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
FESTINGER, L.; SCHACHTER, S. & BACK, K. (1950). Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. New York: Harper
FEYERABEND, P. (1976). Against method. New York: Humanities Press.
FILLENBAUM, S. (1966). Prior deception and subsequent experimental performance: The “faithful” subject. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 532-537.
FINE, R.H. & LINDSKOLD, S. (1971). Subject’s experimental history and subject-based artifact. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 6, 289-290.
FISH, R. (1977). Psychology of science. En J. Spiegel-Rosing & D. de S. Price (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 277-318). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
FISH, S. (1990). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
FODOR, J.A. (1981). Representation: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
FOUCAULT, M. (1975). Vigilar y Castigar. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 1996.
FOX, M.F. (1983). Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.
FRANK, M.L. & RICKARD, K. (1988). Psychology of the scientist: LVII: Anxiety about research: An initial examination of a multidimensional concept. Psychological Reports, 62, 455-463.
FRIEDKIN, N. E. (1978). University Social Structure and Social Networks among Scientists. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (6), 1444-1465.
FULLER, S. (1994). The Social Psychology of Scientific Knowledge: Another Strong Programme. En W.R. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Science, (pp. 162-178). New York: The Guilford Press.
FULLER, S. (1995). On the Motives for the New Sociology of Science. History of the Human Sciences, 8 (2), 117-124.
FULLER, S.; DE MEY, M.; SHINN, T. & WOOLGAR, S. (Eds.). (1989). The cognitive turn: Sociological and psychological perspectivs on science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
FUNKHOUSER, G. R. and MACCOBY, N. (1974). An Experimental Study on Communicating Specialized Science Information to a Lay Audience. Communication Research, 1 (1), 110-128.
GARFIELD, E. (1964). Science Citation Index -A new dimension in indexing. Science, 144, 649-654.
GARFIELD, E. (1978). The 100 most-cited SSCI authors: II. A catalog of their awards and academy memberships. Current Contents, 45, 5-13.
GARFIELD, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
GARFIELD, E. (1989). Delayed Recognition in Scientific Discovery: Citation Frequency Analysis Aids the Search for Case Histories. Current Contents, 23 (5 June 1989), 3-9; see also Garfield, op. cit. note 20.
GARFINKEL, H.; LYNCH, M. & LIVINGSTON, E. (1981). The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-158.
GARRY, A. & PEARSALL, M. (Eds.). (1989). Woman, Knowledge and Reality. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
GASTON, J. (1973). Originality and Competition in Science: A Study of the British High Energy Physics Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GELLER, D.M. (1982). Alternatives to deception: Why, what, and how? In J.E. Sieber (Ed.), The ethics of social research: Surveys and experiments (pp. 40-55). New York: Springer-Verlag.
GERGEN, K. J. (1973). The Codification of Research Ethics. Views of a Doubting Thomas. American Psychologist, 28, 907-912.
GERGEN, K. (1989). La psicología posmoderna y la retórica de la realidad. En T. Ibáñez, El conocimiento de la realidad social (pp. 157-185). Barcelona: Sendai.
GERGEN, K. (1994). Realidades y Relaciones. Aproximaciones a la construcción social. Paidós: Barcelona, 1996.
GHOLSON, B. and BARKER, P. (1985). Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan. Applications in the History of Physics and Psychology. American Psychologist, 40 (7), 755-769.
GHOLSON, B. & HOUTS, A.C. (1989). Toward a cognitive psychology of science. Social Epistemology, 3, 107-127.
GHOLSON, B.; SHADISH, W.R.; NEIMEYER, R.A. & HOUTS, A.C. (Eds.). (1989). Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
GILBERT & MULKAY (1984). Opening Padora's Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GOLDSTEIN, R. (1981). On deceptive rejoinders about deceptive research: A reply to Baron. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 3, 8, 5-6.
GOODSTEIN, L.D. & BRAZIS, K.L. (1970). Credibility of psychologists: An empirical study. Psychological Reports, 27, 835-38.
GORMAN, M.E. (1992a). Simulating science: Heuristics, mental models and technoscientific thinking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
GORMAN, M.E. (1992b). Simulating social epistemology: Experimental and computational approaches. En R.N. Giere (Ed), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 401-427). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
GORMAN, M.E. & CARLSON, B. (1989). Can experiments be used to study science? Social Epistemology, 3, 89-106.
GOTTFREDSON, S. D. (1978). Evaluating Psychological Research Reports. Dimensions, Reliability, and Correlates of Quality Judgments. American Psychologist, 33, 920-934.
GRANOVETTER, M. (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
GRAY, B. H., COOKE, R. A. & TANNEBAUM, A. S. (1978). Research Involving Human Subjects. Science, 201, 1094-1101.
GREEN, D.E. (1964). An experiment in communications: The information exchange group. Science, 143, 308-309.
GREEN, D.E. (1965). Information eschange group number one. Science, 148, 1543.
GRIFFITH, B. C., JAHN, M. J. and MILLER, A. J. (1971). Informal Contacts in Science: A Probabilistic Model for Communication Processes. Science, 173, 164-173.
GRIFFITH, B.C. & MILLER, A.J. (1970). Networks of Informal Communication among Scientifically Productive Scientists. In C.E. Wilson & D.K. Pollack (eds). Communication among Scientists and Engineers, (pp. 125-40). Lexington, Mass.: Heat.
GRIFFITH, B.C. & MULLINS, N.C. (1972). Coherent Social Groups in Scientific Change. Science, 177, 959-64.
GROSS, A.G. (1990). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
GROSS, A.G. (1991). Does rhetoric of science matter? The case of the floppy-eared rabbits. College English, 53, 933-943.
GROVER, S.C. (1981). Toward a psychology of the scientist. Implications of psychological research for contemporary philosophy of science. Lanham, MD: University Press of American.
GUSFIELD, J. (1976). The Literary Rhetoric of Science: Comedy and Pathos in Drinking Driver Research. American Sociological Review, 41, 16-34.
HAAN, N. (1982). Can research on morality be “scientific”? American Psychologist, 37, 1096-1104.
HABERMAS, J. (1970). Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon.
HAGSTROM, W. (1965). The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.
HAMILTON, D. P. (1990). Publishing by─and for?─the Numbers. Science, 250, 1331-1332.
HAMMOND, K. R. and ADELMAN, R. (1976). Science, Values, and Human Judgment. Integration of facts and values requires the scientific study of human judgment. Science, 194, 389-396.
HAMSHER, J.H. & REZNIKOFF, M. (1967). Ethical standards in psychologicl research and graduate training: A study of attitudes within the profession. Proceedings of the 75th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 2, 203-204.
HARDING, S. (1991) How Science? How Knowledge? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
HARRIS, B. (1988). Key works: A history of debriefing in social psychology. In J. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 188-212). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
HARRISON, F. (1974). The Management of Scientists: Determinants of Perceived Role Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 17 (2), 234-241.
HART, J.J. (1982). Psychology of the scientists: XLVI: Correlation between theoretical orientation in psychology and personality type. Psychological Reports, 50, 795-801.
HELMREICH, R.L.; SPENCE, J.T. & PRED, R.S. (1988). Making it without losing it: Type A, achievement motivation, and scientific attainment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 495-504.
HENDRIK, C. (1977). Editorial comment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 1-2.
HERSHEY, N. (1985). IRB jurisdiction and limits on IRB actions. IRB: A Review of Human subjects Research, 7, 2, 7-9.
HEYES, C.M. (1989). Uneasy chapters in the relationship between psychology and epistemology. En B. Gholson, W.R. Shadish, R.A. Neimeyer & A.C. Houts (Eds), Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp 115-137). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
HILGARD, E. (1987). Psychology in America. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
HOLDER, A.R. (1985). Is this a job for the IRB?: The case of the ELISA assay. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 7, 6, 7-8.
HOLMES, D.S. (1976a). Debriefing after psychological experiments: I. Effectiveness of postdeception dehoaxing. american Psychologist, 31, 858-867.
HOLMES, D.S. (1976b). Debreifing after psychological experiments: II. Effectiveness of postexperimental desensitizing. American Psychologist, 31, 868-875.
HOMANS, C.C. (1978). What kind of a myth is the myth of a value-free science? Social Science Quarterly, 58, 530-541.
HOROWITZ, F. D. (1990). The Multiple Partnership. Scientist, University, Agency, and Government. American Psychologist, 45 (1), 51-53.
HOUTS, A.C. & GHOLSON, B. (1989). Brownian notions: One historicist philosopher’s resistance to psychology of science via three truisms and ecological validity. Social Epistemology, 3, 139-146.
HOUTS, A.C. & HADDOCK, C.K. (1992). Answers to philosophical and sociological uses of psychologism in science studies. A behavioral psychology of science. En R.N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in philosophy of science. (pp. 367-399). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
HOUTS, A.C. & KRASNER, L. (1983). American Psychologist, 38, 1253-1254.
HOWARD, G. S. (1985). The Role of Values in the Science of Psychology. American Psychologist, 40 (3), 255-265.
HOWE, M.J.A. (1982). Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 218-219.
HULL, D.L.; TESSNER, P.D. & DIAMOND, A.M.Jr. (1978). Planck’s principle: do younger scientists accept new scientific ideas with greater alacrity then older scientists? Science, 202, 717-723.
IBÁÑEZ, T. (1985). Ciencia, Retórica de la “Verdad” y Relativismo. Archipiélago, 20, 33-40.
IBÁÑEZ, T. (1994). Psicología Social Construccionista. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.
INGELFINGER, F.J. (1974). Peer review in biomedical publication. American Journal of Medicine, 56, 686-92.
JANKE, N.C. (1967). Abuses of citation indexing. Science, 156, 892.
JASANOFF, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
JENSEN, J. P. & BERGIN, A.E. (1988). Mental health values of professional therapists: a national interdisciplinary survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 290-297.
JOHNSON, J.A.; GERMER, C.K.; EFRAN, J.S. & OVERTON, W.F. (1988). Personality as the basis for theoretical predictions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 824-835.
JONES, E.E. & GERARD, H.B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.
JUNG, J. (1975). Snoopology. Human Behavior, 4, 10, 56-59.
KAHN, A.; NELSON, R.E. & GAEDDERT, W.P. (1980). Sex of subject and sex composition of the group as determinants of reward allocations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 737-750.
KALLGREN, C.A. & KENRICK, D.T. (1990). Ethical judgments and nonhuman research subjects: The Effects of phylogenetic closeness and affective valence. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
KASMER, J.A.; HAUGTVEDT, C.P. & STEIDLEY, T.V. (1988). The top 200 social psychologists mentioned in recent social psychology text-books. Contemporary Social Psychology, 13, 9-16.
KASSINOVE, H. & UECKE, C.I. (1991). Religious involvement and behavior therapy training: student conflicts and ethical concerns. The Behavior Therapist, 14, 148-150.
KEISNER, R. (1971). Debriefing and responsiveness to overt experimenter expectancy cues. Unpublished manuscript, Long Island University, Long Island, NY.
KERCKHOFF, A.C.; BACK, K.W. & MILLER, N. (1965). Sociometric Patterns in Hysterical Contagion. Sociometry, 28, 2-15.
KESSLER, M.M. (1965). The MIT Technical Information Project. Physics Today, 18, 28-36.
KEVLES, D.J. (1971). The Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
KIMMEL, A.J. (1991). Predictable biases in the ethical decision making of American psychologists. American Psychologist, 46, 786-788.
KING, D.W. & KING, L.A. (1991). Validity issues in research on Vietnam veteran adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 107-124.
KISIEL, T. (1983). Scientific Discovery: The Larger Problem Situation. New Ideas Psychol., 1 (2), 99-109.
KLEINMAN, D.L. (1995). Politics on the Endless Frontier. Durham: Duke University Press.
KNERR, C.R. & CARROLL, J.D. (1978). Confidentiality and criminological research: The evolving body of law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 69, 311-321.
KNORR, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pregamon.
KNORR-CETINA, K.D. (1983). The Ethnographic Study of Scientific Work: Towards a Constructivist Interpretation of Science. In K.D. Knorr-Cetina & M.J. Mulkay, (Eds). (1983). Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, pp. 115-140. London: Sage.
KNORR, K., KROHN, R. & WHITLEY, R. (Eds.). (1980). The Social Process of Scientific Investigation. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 4. Boston: D. Reidel.
KOCH, S. (1976). Language communities, search cells, and the psychologicl studies. In J.K. Cole & W.J. Arnold (Eds), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1975: Conceptual foundations of psychology (pp. 477-559). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
KOEHLER, J. J. (1993). The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 28-55.
KOULACK, D. & KESELMAN, H.J. (1975). Ratings of psychology journals by members of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 30, 1049-53.
KRASNER, L. & HOUTS, A. C. (1984). A Study of the "Value" Systems of Behavioral Scientists. American Psychologist, 39 (8), 840-850.
KRUGLANSKI, A.K. (1994). The Social-Cognitive Bases of Scientific Knowledge. En W.R. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds), The Social Psychology of Science (pp. 197-213). New York: The Guilford Press.
KRUGLANSKI, A.K. & MACKIE, D.M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgemental process analysis. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds), European review of social psychology, (vol.1, pp. 93-122). New York: Wiley.
KUHN, T.S. (1970). The Structure of scientific revolutions (2ª ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
KUHN, T.S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
KUHN, D.; AMSEL, E. & O’LOUGHLIN, M. (1988). The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills. San Diego: Academic Press.
KUKLA, A. (1982). Logical Incoherence of Value-Free Science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (5), 1014-1017.
KUKLA, A. (1984). Objectivity Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (3), 681 683.
KULKARNI, D. & SIMON, H.A. (1988). The processes of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation. Cognitive Science, 139-175.
KURTINES, W. M., ALVAREZ, M. & AZMITIA, M. (1990). Science and Morality: The Role of Values in Science and the Scientific Study of Moral Phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (3), 283-295.
KUTCHINSKY, B. (1988). The role of HIV testing in AIDS prevention. Copenhagen: Institute of Criminal Science.
LANE, R.E. (1966). The decline of politics and ideology in a knowledgeable society. American Sociological Review, 31, 649-662.
LATOUR, B. (1992). Ciencia en Acción. Barcelona: Labor.
LATOUR, B. & WOOLGAR, S. (1988). La vida en el laboratorio.
LAUDAN, L. (1965). Discussion: Grunbaum on the Duhemian argument. Philosophy of Science, 32, 295-299.
LAUDAN, L. (1983). The demise of the demarcation problem. En R. Laudan (Ed.), The Demarcation Between Science and Pseudoscience (pp. 7-35). Blacksburg: Center for the Study of Science in Society, Virginia Tech.
LAUMAN, E.O. & PAPPI, F.U. (1976). Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press.
LAW, J. (1986a). On power and its tactics: A view from the sociology of Science. The Sociological Review, 34, 1-38.
LAW, J. (1986b). (Ed). Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
LAW, J. (1991). A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge.
LAW, J. (1994). Organizing Modernity. London: Blackwell.
LAZARUS, D. (1982). Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 219.
LEARY, D.E. (1980). The intentions and heritage of Descartes and Locke: Toward a recognition of the moral basis of modern psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 102, 283-310.
LEARY, D.E. (1983). On scientific morality. American Psychologist, 38, 1253.
LEHMAN, E.C. (1974). Academic discipline and faculty religiosity in secular and related colleges. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13, 205-220.
LEHMAN, D.R.; LEMPERT, R.C. & NISBETT, R.E. (1988). The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events. American Psychologist, 43, 431-442.
LEHMAN, H.C. & WITTY, P.A. (1931). Certain attitudes of present day physicists and psychologists. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 664-678.
LEMAINE, G. (1980). Science normale et science hypernormale. Les stratégies de différenciation et les stratégies conservatrices dans la science. Revue française de sociologie, XXI, 499-527.
LEMAINE, G. (1984). La différenciation sociale dans la communauté scientifique. Bulletin de Psychologie, 37, 11-14, 477-488.
LEMAINE, G. & MATALON, B. (1969). La lutte pour la vie dans la cité scientifique. Revue française de sociologie, X, 139-165.
LERNER, B. (1978). The Supreme Court and the APA, AERA,NCME Test Standards. Past References and Future Possibilities. American Psychologist, 915-?.
LESLIE, S.W. (1993). The Cold War and American Science. New York: columbia University Press.
LEVINE, J.M. (1989). Reactions to opinion deviance in small groups. In P.B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed.) (pp. 187-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
LEVINE, J.M. & RUSSO, E.M. (1987). Majority reactions to stable and shifting attitudinal deviates. European Journal of social Psychology, 8, 55-70.
LEVY-LEBOYER, C. & PINEAU, C. (1981). Caractéristiques organisationalles, style de leadership et réussite dans la recherche bio-médicale. Revue de Psychologie Appliquée, 31 (3), 201-235.
LIBBEY, M & ZALTMAN, G. (1967). The Role and Distribution of Written Informal Communication in Theoretical Highe Energy Physics. New York: American Institute of Physics.
LINDSEY, D. (1976). Distinction, achievement and editorial board membership. American Psychologist, 31, 799-804.
LINDSEY, D. (1978). The scientific publication system in social science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
LINDSEY, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of sciencie. The problem of mulitple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10, 145-182.
LODAHL, J.B. & GORDON, G. (1972). The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review, 37, 57-72.
LONG, J.S.; McGINIS, R. & ALISON, P.D. (1980). The problem of junior-authored papers in constructing citation counts. Social Studies of Science, 10, 127-143.
LONGINO, H. A. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
LORD, C.G.; ROSS, L. & LEPPER, M.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
LYNCH, M. (1982). Technical Work and Critical Inquirty: Investigations in a Scientific Laboratory. Social Studies of Science, 12, 499-533.
LYNCH, M. (1985). Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
LYNCH, M. (1991). Laboratory Space and the Technological complex: An Investigations of Topical Contextures. Science in Context, 4, 1, 51-78.
LYNCH, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Etnomethodology and Social Studies of Sciences.
MAASS, A.; WEST, S.G. & CIALDINI, R.B. (1987). Minority influence and conversion. In c. Hendrick (Ed.), Group Processes (pp. 55-79). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
MACDONALD, S.P. (1989). Data-driven and conceptually driven academic discourse. Written Communication, 6, 411-442.
MACDONALD, S.P. (1992). A method for analyzing sentence-level differences in disciplinary knowledge makin. Written Communication, 9, 533-569..
MACKENZIE, D. (1981). Statistics in Britain 1865-1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
MACKLIN, R. (1990). Ethical dilemmas. Presentation to the Policy division, HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Columbia University, New York.
MACINTYRE, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.
MADIGAN, R.; JOHNSON, S. & LINTON, P. (1995). The Language of Psychology. APA Style as Epistemology. American Psychologist, 50, 6, 428-436.
MAHONEY, M.J. (1976). Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge University Press.
MAHONEY, M.J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161-175.
MAHONEY, M.J. (1979). Psychology of the scientist: An evaluative review. Social studies of Science, 9, 349-75.
MAHONEY, M.J. (1982). Publication, politics and scientific progress. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 220-221.
MAHONEY, M.J. & DEMONBREUN, B.G. (1978). Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 229-238.
MAHONEY, M.J.; KAZDIN, A.E. & KENIGSBERG, M. (1978). Getting published: The effects of self-citation and institutional affiliation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2, 69-70.
MAINI, S.M. & NORDBECK, B. (1973). Critical moments, the creative process and research motivation. International Social Science Journal, 25, 190-201.
MANDLER, J. (1983). Representation. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: vol 3. Cognitive development (4th ed. pp. 420-494). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
MARCUSE, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon.
MARGOLIS, J. (1967). Citation indexing and evaluation of scientific papers. Science, 155, 1213-1219.
MASLOW, A.H. (1966). The psychology of science. New York: Harper & Row.
MAY, K.O. (1967). Abuses of citation indexing. Science, 156, 890-891.
McCARTNEY, J.L. (1973). Manuscript reviewing. Sociological Quarterly, 14, 290, 444-46.
McCLELLAND, D. (1979). On the dynamics of creative physical scientists. In L. Hudson (ed.), The Ecology of Human Intelligence (pp. 309-41). England: Penguin.
McGUIRE, W.J. (1969). Suspiciousness of experimenter’s intent. In R. Rosenthal & R.L. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research (pp. 13-57). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McREYNOLDS, P. (1971). Reliability of ratings of research papers. American Psychologist, 26, 400-401.
MELTON, G.B. & GRAY, J.W. (1988). Ethical dilemmas in AIDS research. American Psychologist, 43, 60-64.
MENZEL, H. (1960). Review of Studies in the Flow of Information Among Scientists. New York: Columbia University.
MERLUZZI, T.V. & BRISCHETTO, C.S. (1983). Breach of confidentiality and perceived trustworthiness of counselors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 245-251.
MERTON, R.K. (1942/1973). The normative structure of science. In R.K. Merton & N.W.Storer (Eds.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MERTON, R.K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22, 635-639.
MERTON, R.K. (1968a). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56-63.
MERTON, R.K. (1968b). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
MERTON, R.K. (1973). The sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MERTON, R.D. & BARBER, E. (1963). Sociological Ambivalence. En E.A. Tiryakian (Ed), Sociological Theory, Values, and Sociocultural Change (pp. 91-120). Glencoe: The Free Press.
MICHAEL, M. (1991). Discourses of Danger and Dangerous Discourses: Patrolling the Borders of Science, Nature and Society. Discourse & Society, 2, 1, 5-28.
MILGRAM, S. (1964). Issues in the study of obedience: A reply to Baumrind. American Psychologist, 19, 848-852.
MILLS, J. (1976). A procedure for explaining experiments involving deception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 3-13.
MITCHELL, M.B. (1961). Trends towards multiple authorship in scientific publication. Journal of Psychology, 52, 125-131.
MITCHELL, M.B. (1969). Social Networks in Urban Situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
MITROFF, I.I. (1973). Epistemology as general systems theory: an approach to the design of complex decision-making experiments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 3, 117-34.
MITROFF, I.I. (1974a). Systems, inquiry, and the meanings of falsification. Philosophy of Science, 40, 255-76.
MITROFF, I.I. (1974b). The subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists. Amsterdam- The Netherlands and San Francisco: Elsevier and Jossey-Bass.
MITROFF, I. I. (1974c). Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 39, 579-595.
MITROFF, I.I. (1983). The Subjective Side of Science. Seaside, CA: Intersystems.
MITROFF, I.I. & BETZ, F. (1972). Dialectical decision theory: a meta-theory of decision-making. Management Science, 19, 11-24.
MITROFF, I.I. & CHUBIN, D.E. (1979). Peer review at NSF: A dialectical policy analysis. Social Studies of Science, 9, 199-232.
MITROFF, I. I. & FITZGERALD, I. (1977). On the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Chapter in the Psychology of Science. Human Relations, 30 (8), 657-674.
MITROFF, I.I. & MASON. R.O. (1974). On evaluating the scientific contribution of the Apollo moon missions via information theory. Management Science, 20, 1501-1513.
MOSCOVICI, S. (1985). Innovation and minority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny & E.Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 9-51). New York: Cambridge University Press.
MOSCOVICI, S. (1987). Est-ce qu’il y a des contre-révolutions scientifiques? History and Technology, 4, 543-559.
MOSCOVICI, S. (1993). Toward a Social Psychology of Science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 23, 4, 343-374.
MULKAY, M. (1969). Some aspects of Cultural Growth in the Natural Sciences. Social Research, 36 (1), 125-139.
MULKAY, M. (1993). Rhetorics of Hope and Fear in the Great Embryo Debate. Social Studies of Science, 23, 721-742.
MULKAY, M. and GILBERT, G. N. (1982). Accounting for Error: How Scientists Construct their Social World When they Account for Correct and Incorrect Belief. Sociology, 16, 165-183.
MULKAY, M.; GILBERT, G.N. & WOOLGAR, S. (1975). Problem Areas and Research Networks in Science. Sociology, 9, 187-203.
MULLINS, N.C. (1966). Social Networks among Biological Scientists. Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University.
MULLINS, N.C. (1972). The Development of a Scientific Specialty: The Phage Group and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Minerva, 10, 51-82.
MYERS, C.R. (1979). Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology. American Psychologist, 25, 1041-1048.
MYERS, G. (1990). Writing biology. Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
NELSON, C. & POLLACK, N. (Eds). Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1970.
NETTLER, G. (1984). Comment on Kukla. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (3), 680.
NISSANI, M. (1989a). An Experimental Paradigm for the Study of Conceptual Conservatism and Change. Psychological Reports, 65, 19-24.
NISSANI, M. (1989b). A hands-on instructional approach to the conceptual shift aspect of scientific discovery. o, 105-107.
NISSANI, M. and HOEFLER-NISSANI, D. M. (1992). Experimental Studies of Belief Dependence of Observations and of Resistance to Conceptual Change. Cognition and Instruction, 9 (2), 97-111.
NOEL, R.C. & ALLEN, M.J. (1976). Sex and ethnic bias inthe evaluation of student editorials. Journal of Psychology, 94, 53-58.
ORNE, M.T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
OROMANER, M. (1977). Professional age and the reception of sociological publications: A test of the Zuckerman-Merton hypothesis. Social Studies of Science, 7, 381-88.
OSKAMP, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261-265.
OVER, R. (1982). Collaborative Research and Publication in Psychology. American Psychologist, 37 (9), 996-1001.
OVER, R. & SMALLMAN, S. (1973). Maintenance of individual visibility in publication of collaborative research by psychologists. American Psychologist, 28, 161-166.
PAGÈS, R. (1976). Specificité scientifiquement intrinseque des problemes ethiques et civiques de la psychologie. XXIe. Congrés International de Psychologie. Paris, juillet 1976.
PAISLEY, W.J. (1965). The Flow of (Behavioral) Science Information: a Review of the Research Literature. Palo Alto: Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University.
PANUSH, R. (1989). The Limits of Science in Communication Disorders: A Reply to Siegel. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 301-302.
PAPASTAMOU, S. & MUGNY, G. (1985). Rigidity and minority influence: The influence of the social in social influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny & E. Van Avermaet (Eds), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 113-136). New York: Cambridge University Press.
PATTERSON, E.H. (1969). Evaluation of manuscripts submitted for publication. American Psychologist, 36, 885-91.
PATTULLO, E.L. (1980). Who risks what in socialresearch? The Hastings Center Report, 10, 15-18.
PATTULLO, E.L. (1982). The limits of the “right” of privacy. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 4, 3-5.
PERLMAN, D. (1984). Recent developments in personality and social psychology: A citation analysis. Personal
PFEFFER, LEONE, A. & STREHL, K. (1977). Paradigm development and particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Social Forces, 55, 938-51.
PLANCK, M. (1949). Scientific Autobiography. New York, Philosophical Library.
POLANYI, M. (1963). The Potential Theory of Adsorption. Science, 141, 1010-1013.
POPPER, K.R. (1965). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
POTTER, J. & MULKAY, M.J. (1985). Scientists’ Interview Talk: Interviews as a Technique for Revealing Participants’ Interpretive Practices’. In M. Brenner, J. Brown & D. Canter (Eds). The Research Interview: Uses and Approches, pp. 247-271. London: Academic Press.
PRENTICE, E.D. & ANTONSON, D.L. (1987). A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 9, 1, 9-11.
PRICE, de S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Oxford University Press.
PRICE, de S. & BEAVER, D.B. (1966). Collaboration in an Invisible College. American Psychologist, 21, 1011-1018.
RAGAN, C.; MALONY, H.N. & BEIT-HALLAMI, B. (1980). Psychologists and religion: professional factors and personal belief. Review of Religious Research, 21, 208-217.
RAUP, D.M. (1986). The nemesis affair: A story of the death of dinosaurs and the ways of science. New York: W.W. Norton.
REAMER, F.G. (1979). Protecting research subjects and unintended consequences: The effects of guarantees of confidentiality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 497-506.
RESTIVO, S. (1988). Modern Science as a Social Problem. Social Problems, 35, 206-225.
RILEY, M.W. & COHN, R. (1958). Control Networks in Informal Groups. Sociometry, 21, 30-49.
RING, K.; WALLSTON, K. & COREY, M. (1970). Mode of debriefing as a factor affecting subjective reaction to a Milgram-type obedience experiment: An ethical inquiry. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1, 67-88.
ROE, A. (1951a). A psychological study of eminent biologist scientists. Psychological Monographs, 65, 331.
ROE, A. (1951b). A psychological study of eminent physical scientists Genetic Psychology Monographs, 43, 121-235.
ROE, A. (1953). The making of a scientists. New York: Dodd, Mead.
ROOSE, K.D. & ANDERSEN, C.J. (1970). A rating of graduate programs. Wasington, D.C.: American Council of Education.
RORTY, R. (1979). La filosofía y el espejo de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra, 1983.
ROSENTHAL, R. & BLANCK, P.D. (1993). Science and ethics in conducting, analyzing, and reporting social science research: Implications for social scientists, judges, and lawyers. Indiana Law Journal, 68.
ROSENTHAL, R. & ROSNOW, R.L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: Wiley.
ROSENTHAL, R. & ROSNOW, R.L. (1984). Applying Hamlet’s question to the ethical conduct of research. American Psychologist, 39, 561-563.
ROSENTHAL, R. & ROSNOW, R.L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
ROSENWEIN, R.E. (1994). Social Influence in Science: Agreemant and Dissent in Achieving Scientific Consensus. En W.R. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds), The Social Psychology of Science (pp. 262-285). New York: The Guilford Press.
ROSENWEIN, R.E. & CAMPBELL, D.T. (1992). Mobilization to achieve collective action and democratic majority/plurality amplification. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 125-138.
ROSENWEIN, R.E. & KOENEMUND, K. (1991). Mutual majority and minority influence as a function of task ambiguity in science: An experimental analogue. Unpublished research.
ROSNOW, R. L. and ROSENTHAL, R. (1989). Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science. American Psychologist, 44 (10) 1276- 1284.
ROSNOW, R. L.; ROTHERAM-BORUS, M.J.; CECI, S.J.; BLANCK, P.D. & KOOCHER, G.P. (1993). The Institucional Review Board as a Mirror of Scientific and Ethical Standards. American Psychologist, 48 (7), 821-826.
ROTHERAM-BORUS, M. (1991). HIV interventions for adolescents. Washington, DC: Surgeon General’s Panel on HIV:
ROWNEY, J.A. & ZENISEK, T.J. (1980). Manuscript characteristics influencing reviewers’ decisions. Canadian Psychology, 21, 17-21.
ROYCE, J.R. (1964). The encapsulated man: An interdisciplinary essay on the search for meaning. Princeton, NJ.: D. Van Nostrand.
ROYCE, J.R. (1975). Three ways of knowing and the scientific world-view. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference for the Unity of Science, New York City.
ROZOVSKY, F.A. (1990). Consent to treatment: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Boston: Little Brown.
RUDNER, R. (1953). The scientist qua scientist makes value-judgments. Philosophy of Science, 20, 1-6.
SAMPSON, E. E. (1977). Psychology and the American Ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (11), 767-782.
SAMPSON, E. E. (1978). Scientific Paradigms and Social Values: Wanted─A Scientific Revolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (11), 1332-1343.
SANZ-MENENDEZ, L. & SANTESMASES, M.J. (1996). Ciencia y política: Interacciones entre el Estado y el sistema de investigación. Zona Abierta, 75/76, 1-20.
SCARR, S. & WEBER, B.L.T. (1978). The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist. American Psychologist, 33, 935.
SCHACHTER, S & SINGER, J. (1979). Comments on the Maslach and Marshall-Zimbardo experiments. American Psychologist, 37, 989-995.
SHADISH, W.R.; TOLLIVER, D.; GRAY, M. & SEN GUPTA, S.K. (1995). Author Judgements about Works They cite: Three Studies from Psycology Journals. Social Studies of Science, 25, 477-98.
SCHEFFLER, I. (1967). Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
SCHLENKER, B.R. & FORSYTH, D.R. (1977). On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 369-396.
SCHWARTZ, B. (1990). The Creation and Destruction of Value. American Psychologist, 45 (1), 7-15.
SCINTO, L.F.W. (1989). Written language and psychological development. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
SCOTT, W.A. (1974). Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychologist, 29, 698-702.
SEILER, L.M. & MURTHA, J.M. (1980). Federal regulation of social research using human subjects: A critical assessment. American Sociologist, 15, 146-157.
SERCHUK, A. (1989). What can the cognitive psychology of science bring to science and technology studies? Social Epistemology, 3, 147-152.
SHADISH, W.R. & FULLER, S. (Eds), The Social Psychology of Science. New York: The Guilford Press.
SHADISH, W.R.; FULLER, S. & GORMAN, M.E. (1994). Social Psychology of Science: A Conceptual and Research Program. En W.R. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds), The Social Psychology of Science (pp. 3-123). New York: The Guilford Press.
SHADISH, W.R. & NEIMEYER, R.A. (1989). Contributions of psychology to an integrative science studies: The shape of things to come. En S. Fuller, M. De Mey, T. Shinn & S. Woolgar (Eds.), The cognitive turn: Sociological and psychological perspectives on science (pp. 13-38). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Dluwer.
SHAFRANSKE, E. & MALONY, H.N. (1990). Clinical psychologists’ religious and spiritual orientations and their practice of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 72-78.
SHAPIN, S. & SHAFFER, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
SCHLENKER, B.R. (1974). Social Psychology and Science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 1-15.
SHER, I.H. & GARFIELD, E. (1965). New tools for improving and evaluating the Effectiveness of Research. Presented at ghe Second conference on Research Program Effectiveness, Washinton, D.C. July, 27-29
SHINN, T. (1980). Division du savoir et spécificité organisationelle. Les laboratoires de recherche industrielle en France. Revue française de sociologie, XXI, 3-35.
SIEBER, J.E. (1982). The ethics of social research: fieldwork, regnulation, and publication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
SIEBER, J.E. (1983). Deception in social research III: The nature and limits of debriefing. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 5, 3, 1-4.
SIEBER, J.E. (1991). Sharing Social Science Data Advantatges and Challenges. Newbury Park: SAGE.
SIEBER, J.E. (1992). Planning ethically resonsible research. A guide for students and internal review boards. Newbury Park: SAGE.
SIEBER, J.E. (1994). Scientists’ Response to Ethical Issues in Research. En W.R. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds), The Social Psychology of Science (pp. 286-299). New York: The Guilford Press.
SIEBER, J.E. & SORENSEN, J.L. (1991). Ethical issues in community-based research and intervention. In J. Edwards; R.S. Tindale, L. Heat & E.J. Posavac (Eds.), Social psychological applications to social issues: vol 2. Methodological issues in applied social psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
SILVER, H. R. (1983). Scientific Achievement and the Concept of Risk. The British Journal of Sociology, 34 (1), 39-43.
SILVERMAN, I.; SHULMAN, A.D. & WIESENTHAL, D.L. (1979). Effects of deceiving and debriefing psychological subjects on performance in later experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 203-212.
SIMONTON, D. K. (1976). Philosophical Eminence, Beliefs, and Zeitgeist: An Individual─Generational Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (4), 630-640.
SIMONTON, D. K. (1979). Multiple Discovery and Invention: Zeitgeist, Genius, or Chance?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (9), 1603-1616.
SIMONTON, D. K. (1988a). Scientific Genius: A Psychology of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SIMONTON, D.K. (1988b). Age and outstanding achievement: what do we know after a century of research. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251-267.
SIMONTON, D.K. (1989). Chance-configuration theory of scientific creativity. In B. Gholson, W.R. Shadish, r.a. Neimeyer & a.c. Houts (Eds.), Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 170-213). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
SIMONTON, D. K. (1992). The Social Context of Career Success and Caourse for 2,026 Scientists and Inventors. Personality and Social psychology Bulletin, 18 (4), 452-463.
SINGER, B.F. (1971). Toward a psychology of science. American Psychologist, 26, 1010-1016.
SINGER, E. (1984). Public reactions to some ethical issues of social research: Attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 501-509.
SKINNER, B.F. (1965). A case history in the scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221-233.
SMIGEL, E.D. & ROSS, H.L. (1970). Factors in the editorial decision. American Sociologist, 5, 19-21.
SMITH, B.L.R. (1992). The Adviser. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
SMITH, S.S. & RICHARDSON, D. (1983). Amelioration of deception and harm in psychological research: The important role of debriefing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1075-1082.
SOLINGEN, E. (1996). Entre el mercado y el Estado: los científicos desde una perspectiva comparada. Zona Abierta, 75/76, 21-55.
SPERRY, R.W. (1977). Bridging Science and Values. A Unifying View of Mind and Brain. American Psychologist, 32, 237-245.
SPIEGEL, D. & KEITH-SPIEGEL, P. (1970). Assignment of Publication Credits: Ethics and Practices of Psychologists. American Psychologist, 25, 738-748.
STORER, N.W. (1966). The Social System of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
STROHMETZ, D.B.; ALTERMAN, A.I. & WALTER, D. (1990). Subject selection bias in alcoholics volunteering for a treatment study. Alcoholism: clinical and Experimental Research, 14, 736-738.
SULS, J. & FLETCHER, B. (1983). Social Comparison in the Social and Physical Sciences: An Archival Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 3, 575-580.
SULS, J.M. & ROSNOW, R.L. (1981). The delicate balance between ethics and artifacts in behavioral research. In A. J. Kimmel (Ed.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Ethics of human subject research (nº 10. pp. 55-67). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
TAJFEL, H. & TURNER, L. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, California: Brooks Cole Pub. Company.
TEGHTSOONIAN, M. (1974). Distribution by sex of authors and editors of psycological journals. 1970-1972. Are there enough women editors? American Psychologist, 29, 262-269.
THAGARD, P. (1989). Scientific cognition: Hot or cold? In S. Fuller, M. DeMey, T. Shinn & S. Woolgar (Eds.), The cognitive turn: Sociological and psychologycal perspectives on science (pp. 71-82). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
THOMAS, G. (1982). Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscript. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 240-241.
THOMAS, S.B. & QUINN, S.C. (1991). The Tuskegee syphilis study, 1932 to 1972: Implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1498-1505.
TODOROV, T. (1990). Genres in discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
TOULMIN, S. & LEARY, D.E. (1985). The cult of empiricism in psychology and beyond. In S. Koch & D. Leary (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 594-617). New York: McGraw-Hill.
TRACY, K. & NAUGHTON, J. (1994). The Identity Work of Questioning in Intellectual Discussion. Communication Monographs, 61, 281-302.
TWENEY, R.D.; DOHERTY, M.E & MYNATT, C.R. (Eds). (1981). On scientific thinking. New York: Columbia University Press.
VALDISERRI, R.O.; TAMA, G.M. & HO, M. (1988). The role of community advisory committees in clinical trials of anti-HIV agents. IRB: A Review of Human subjects Research, 10, 4, 5-7.
VON GLINOW, M.A. & NOVELLI, L. (1982). Ethical standards within organizational behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 405-436.
WAHL, J.M. (1972). The utility of deception: An empirical analysis. In Symposium on Ethical issues in the Experimental Manipulation of Human Beings, Western Psychological Association, Portland, Oregon.
WATERS, L. (1977). A Confusing Mixture. American Psychologist, 32, 988-989.
WATKINS, M.W. (1979). Chance and interrater agreement on manuscripts. American Psychologist, 34, 796-798.
WEINER, W.B. (1979). Notes on the methodology of scientific research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
WEST, S.G. & GUNN, S.P. (1978). Some Issues of Ethics and Social Psychology. American Psychologist, 33, 30-38.
WILE, D.B. (1977). Questioning Sperry’s Bridge from Brain to Mind to Values. American Psychologist, 32, 987-988,
WILKES, J.M. (1994). Characterizing Niches and Strata in Science by Tracing Differences in Cognitive Styles Distribution. En W.R. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds), The Social Psychology of Science (pp. 300-315). New York: The Guilford Press.
WILLIAMS, P.C. (1984). Success in spite of failure: Why IRBs falter in reviewing risks and benefits. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 6, 3, 1-4.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1953). Investigaciones Filosóficas. Barcelona: Crítica, 1988.
WOLPERT, L. (1992). The Unnatural Nature of Science. London, Faber and Faber.
WONG, P.T. (1981). Implicit editorial policies and the integrity of psychology as an empirical science. American Psychologist, 36, 690-691.
YIRGA, H., SELTZER, R. and ELLIS, W. (1987). Comparing Scientific Attitudes of Natural and Social Scientists. SSR, 71 (3), 249-251.
YOELS, W. (1974). The structure of scientific fields and the allocation of editorship on scientific journals: Some observations on the politics of knowledge. Sociological Quarterly, 15, 264-76.
YOTOPOULOS, P.A. (1961). Institutional affiliation of the contributors to three professional journals. American Economic Review, 51, 665-70.
ZEITLIN, I.M. (1968). Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
ZIMAN, J.M. (1968). Public knowledge, an essay concerning the social dimensions of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ZUCKERMAN, H. (1968). Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of symbolism an its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 276-291.
ZUCKERMAN, H. (1970). Stratification in American science. Sociological Inquiry, 40, 235-57.
ZUCKERMAN, H. (X). Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and Authorship. American Sociological Review, xxxx, 391-403.
ZUCKERMAN, H. & MERTON, R.K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation,structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9, 66-100.
ZUCKERMAN, H. & MERTON, R.D. (1972). Age, aging, and age strucutre in sicnece. In M. W. Riley; M. Johnson & A. Foner (Eds). Aging and society: vol. 3. Sociology of age stratification. New York: Sage.
ZUCKERMAN, H. & MERTON, R.D. (1973). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system. In N. Storer (ed). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
WHITEHURST, G.J. (1979). The quandary of manuscript reviewinig. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 241-242.
WHITEHURST, G.J. (1983). Interrater agreement for reviews for Developmental Review. Developmental Review, 3, 73-78.
ZUCKERMAN, H. (19). Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. American Sociological Review. 391- 403.
ZUCKERMAN, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.
Publicado
Como Citar
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2007 GESCIT
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
