Visualization technology in neuropsychological research: A case study on corporal imaginary
Abstract
Psychology, as a discipline, adopts a dualistic imaginary of the body: as a porous yet closed boundary. Therefore, accessing the "truth" of the subject requires all sorts of techniques and tools. The psychological discourse often considers these devices in exteriority of the subject. As a counterpoint, I propose that the artifacts are a constituent part of the corporal imaginary. The argument compares the Skinner Air Crib and Gesell’s Laboratory, two inventions of the mid-twentieth century, and a XXI century neuropsychological research about the location of the self. In the first two cases, the body is constructed as a porous barrier that participates within hygienic parameters, both operating and optimizing individual performance and military metaphors that has shaped social policy practices. The discussion of the neuropsychological research, as a case study, does not intend to question the results of the research from the neuropsychological field. It points towards those understandings and assumptions that reveal the connection of the neuropsychological discourse with its cultural context. Special attention is paid to gender construction, ways of mediating scientific knowledge, the hybridity between the neuropsychological reductionism of the scientific framing and the entertainment industry; as well as to the new forms of identity formation and the complementarity of the visuals and performance in the contemporary scene.
Keywords
Technology, Psychology, Neuropsychology, DiscourseReferences
Baudrillard, Jean (1977/1978). Cultura y simulacro (P. Rovira, Trad.). Barcelona: Editorial Kairós.
Beaumont, Graham (2008). Introduction to Neuropsychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Benthien, Claudia (2002). Skin. On the cultural border between self and the world. (Thomas Dunlap, Trad.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Brauer, Fae (2010). The transparent body: Biocultures of evolution, eugenics, and scientific racism. En Jane Kromm y Susan Benforado Bakewell (Eds.), A history of visual culture. Western civilization from the 18th to the 21th Century (pp. 89-103). New York-Oxford: Berg.
Braunstein, Néstor; Pasternac, Maracelo; Benedito, Gloria y Saal, Frida (1979). Psicología: Ideología y Ciencia. Mexico D.F.: Siglo XXI.
Broadhurst, Sue (2006). Digital practices: an aesthetic and neuroesthetic approach to virtuality and embodiment. Performance Research, 11(4), 137- 147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13528160701363705
Burman, Erica (1994). Deconstructing Developmental Psychology. London and New York: Routledge.
Burman, Erica (1998). Deconstructing Feminist Psychology. London, New York: Sage.
Cartwright, Lisa (1995). Screening the body. Tracing Medicine´s visual culture. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.
Corbin, Alain (1986). The foul and the fragant: Odor and the french social imagination (M. Kochan Berg, Trad.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cowan, Ruth Schawartz (1983). More work for mother. The irones of the household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books Inc.
Dijck, José van. (2005). The transparent body: A cultural analysis of medical imaging. Seatle: University of Washington Press.
Garza, Gilbert y Fisher Smith, Amy (2009). Beyond neurobiological reductionism. Theory and Psychology, 19(4), 519- 544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354309336318
Gergen, Kenneth y Davis, Keith (1985). The social construction of the person. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
Gesell, Arnold (1924). The preschool child as a health problem. The American Journal of Nursing, 24(11), 885-889.
Gesell, Arnold (1923). The pre-school child from the Standpoint of public hygiene and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, Co.
Gesell, Arnold (1935/1991). Cinemanylisis: A Method of Behavior Study. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 152(4), 549-562.
Henriques, Julian; Hollway, Wendy; Urwin, Cathy; Venn, Couze y Walkerdine, Valerie (1984/1998). Changing the subject. Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London – New York: Routledge.
Ibánez, Tomás (1994). Psicología social construccionista. Guadalajara (México): Universidad de Guadalajara.
Ibáñez, Tomás (2001). Municiones para disidentes. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Kromm, Jane y Benforado Bakewell, Susan (Eds.) (2010). A history of visual culture. Western civilization from the 18th to the 21th Century. New York- Oxford: Berg.
McCabe, David P. y Castel, Alan D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific easoning. Elsevier Journal, 107(1), 343-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964/1968). The visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trad.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Parker, Ian y Shotter, John (1990). Deconstructing Social Psychology. London: Routledge.
Rose, Nikolas (2007). The politics of life itself. Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Thirioux, Bérangère; Mercier, Manuel. R.; Jorland, Gérard; Berthoz, Alain y Blanke, Olaf (2010). Mental Imagery of Self-Location during Spontaneous and Active Self–Other Interactions: An Electrical Neuroimaging Study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(21), 7202–7214.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2013 Heidi Figueroa Sarriera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
