How to govern the complexity? Invitation to an hybrid and relational urban governance

Authors

  • Marc Grau-Solés Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
  • Lupicinio Íñiguez-Rueda Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
  • Joan Subirats Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Abstract

This article draws upon the literature on governance so as to analyze substantive consequences of citizen participation in urban policies. Nevertheless, we believe that such analysis must take into account public policy’ ability to incorporate complexity. In order to do so, we suggest the notion of "integrality". Thus, understanding cities as urban assemblies made up of multiple versions of reality leads us to rethink the notion of politics. Subsequently, the idea of public action is developed offering new, hybrid and non modern concepts of political subjects and democracy.

Keywords

Urban Governance, Actor-network theory, Public action, Integrality

References

Barry, Andrew; Born, Georgina & Weszkalnys, Gisa (2008). Logics of Interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 37(1), 20-49.

Bingham, Nick & Hinchliffe, Steve (2008). Reconstituting natures: Articulating other modes of living together. Geoforum, 39(1), 83-87.

Blanco, Ismael; Lowndes, Vivien & Pratchet, Lawrence (2011). Policy networks and network governance: towards greater conceptual clarity. Political Studies Review, en prensa.

Blanco, Ismael; Castro, Mauro & Grau, Marc (2010, 22-27 de marzo). Citizen participation in urban governance networks. Causes and consequences of the regeneration policies of historical city centres in Madrid and Barcelona. Comunicación presentada en ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Munster, Alemania.

Boix Mansilla, Veronica & Gardner, Howard (2003). Assessing Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier. An empirical exploration of “symptoms of quality”. Extraido el 12 de junio de 2010, de http://www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/6

Callon, Michel (1986). Algunos elementos para una sociología de la traducción: la domesticación de las vieiras y los pescadores de la bahía de St. Brieuc. En Juan M. Iranzo, Teresa González de la Fe y José R. Blanco (Coords.), Sociología de la ciencia y la tecnología (pp. 259-282). Madrid: CIS.

Callon, Michel (1999). Actor-Network Theory: the Market Test. En John Law y John Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network and After (pp. 181-195). Oxford, Malden: Blackwell.

Callon, Michel (2004). The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design. J. Center Inf. Studies, 5(3), 3-10.

Callon, Michel; Lascaumes, Pierre & Barthe, Yannic (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Castree, Noel (2003). Environmental Issues: Relational Ontologies and Hybrid Politics. Progress in Human Geography, 27(2), 203-211.

Davies, Jonathan (2007). The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion. Political Studies, 55(4), 779-800.

Domènech, Miquel & Tirado, Francisco (2008, abril, 10-11). Ciencia, tecnología y ciudadanía: la cosmopolítica y la reinvención de la democracia. Comunicación presentada en las Jornadas Hispano-Lusas sobre Sociología de la Ciencia, Conocimiento y Tecnología, Segovia, España.

Grau, Marc; Íñiguez-Rueda, Lupicinio & Subirats, Joan (2010). La Perspectiva sociotécnica en el análisis de políticas públicas. Psicología Política, 41, 61-80.

Grau-Solés, Marc; Íñiguez-Rueda, Lupicinio & Subirats, Joan (2011). Análisis de políticas públicas relacional, híbrido y no-moderno: la integralidad de las políticas públicas en el barrio de Casc Antic (Barcelona). Manuscrito sin publicar.

Haraway, Donna (1999). Las promesas de los monstruos: Una política regeneradora para otros inapropiados/bles. Política y Sociedad, 30, 121-163.

Healy, Stephen. (2004). The Sustainability Problematique - Reconnecting Society and Nature. En Evie Katz, Helen Cheney y Fiona Solomon (Eds.), Sustainability and Social Science Roundtable Proceedings (pp. 187 - 205). Sydney: Institute for Sustainable Futures ISF/CSIRO.

Hetherington, Kevin (1999). From Blindness to Blindness: museums, heterogeneity and the subject. En John Law y John Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and after (pp 51-73).Oxford, Malden: Blackwell.

Hinchliffe, Steve (2002). Inhabiting - landscapes and natures. En Kat Anderson, Mona Domosh, Steve Pile y Nigel Thrift (Eds.), The Handbook of Cultural Geography (pp. 207–226). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Hinchliffe, Steve (2008). Reconstituting nature conservation: Towards a careful political ecology. Geoforum, 39(1), 88–97.

Kwa, Chunglin (2002). Romantic and Baroque Conceptions of Complex Wholes in the Sciences. En John Law y Annemarie Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices (pp. 23–52). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Latour, Bruno (1987). Ciencia en Acción. Barcelona: Labor.

Latour, Bruno. (1998). To modernise or ecologise? That is the question. En Bruce Braun y Noel Castree (Eds.), Remaking reality: nature at the millenium (pp. 221-42). London: Routledge.

Latour, Bruno. (1999). Ein ding ist ein thing: a (philosophical) platform for a left (European) party. Soundings, a journal of politics and culture, 12, 12-25.

Latour, Bruno (2001). ¿Qué protocolo requieren los nuevos experimentos colectivos? Boletín CF+S, 32/33. Extraído el 10 de julio de 2010, de http://habitat.aq.upm.es/boletin/n32/ablat.es.html

Latour, Bruno (2002). Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (2004). Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics?: Comments on the Peace Terms of Ulrich Beck. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 450-462.

Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Latour, Bruno (2007). Turning Around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries' Paper. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 811-820.

Latour, Bruno & Gagliardi, Pasquale (Dirs.) (2008). Las atmósferas de la política. Diálogo sobre la democracia. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.

Law, John (2000). Objects, Spaces, Others. Lancaster: Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. Extraido el 10 de julio de 2010, de http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/law-objects-spaces-others.pdf

Law, John & Mol, Annemarie (2001). Situating technoscience: an inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(5), 609 - 621.

Law, John & Mol, Annemarie (2002). Complexities. Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Law, John & Mol, Annemarie (2008). Globalization in practice: on the politics of boiling pigswill. Geoforum, 39(1), 133–143.

Law, John & Singleton, Vicky (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331-355.

Law, John & Urry, John (2003). Enacting the Social. Lancaster: Department of Sociology and the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. Extraido el 15 de julio de 2009, de http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/law-urry-enacting-the-social.pdf

Lawrence, Roderick J. & Despres, Caroline (2004). Futures of Transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 397-405.

López, Daniel & Domènech Miquel (2008). On inscriptions and ex-inscriptions: the production of immediacy in a home telecare service. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(4), 663 - 675.

Marres, Noortje (2005). No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits after the Displacement of Politics. Tesis doctoral sin publicar, Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

Marres, Noortje (2007). The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759-780.

Marres, Noortje. (2008). The Making of Climate Publics: Eco-homes as Material Devices of Publicity. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 16, 27-45.

Marres, Noortje. (2009). Testing Powers of Engagement: Green Living Experiments, the Ontological Turn and the Undoability of Involvement. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 117-133.

Mol, Annemarie (1999). Ontological Politics. A word and some question. En John Law y John Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and after (pp 51-73).Oxford, Malden: Blackwell.

Mol, Annemarie (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC y London: Duke University Press.

Mol, Annemarie & Law, John. (1994). Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641-671.

Ramadier, Thierry (2004). Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures, 36(4), 423-439.

Rodíguez, Israel (2008). El gir simètric en l’estudi de l’acció col·lectiva. Tesis doctoral sin publicar. Departament de Psicologia Social, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona.

Sorensen, Eva & Torfing, Jacob (2005). The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195- 218.

Spink, Peter K. (2007a, octubre y noviembre). Procesos de organización y Acción pública. La Posibilidades de Autonomía del Lugar. Trabajo para el Simposio Procesos de organización. Comunidades y Prácticas Sociales. XIV Encuentro Nacional ABRAPSO, Río de Janeiro, Brasil.

Spink, Peter K. (2007b, setiembre, 6-7). Institutions, Civil Society and Social Capital: the dangers of the post Washington Consensus. Comunicación presentada en el XXXVII International Congress. Latin American Studies Association, Montreal, Canadá.

Subirats, Joan & Blanco, Ismael (2009). ¿Todo lo urbano es social y todo lo social es urbano? Dinámicas urbanas y dilemas de políticas públicas. Medio Ambiente y Urbanización, 70(1), 3-13.

Swyingedouw, Erik (2005). Governance innovation and the Citizen: the Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42(11),1991-2006.

Thompson, Charis (2002). When Elephants Stand for Competing Models of Nature. En Annemarie Mol y John Law (Eds.), Complexities in Science, Technology and Medicine (pp 166–190). Durham, N. Ca.: Duke University Press.

Wagenaar, Hendrik (2007). Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 17 -50.

Whatmore, Sarah (2006). Materialist returns: practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 13(4), 600-609.

Whatmore, Sarah (2009). Mapping Knowledge Controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), 587-598.

Whatmore, Sarah & Hinchliffe, Steve (2003). Living cities: making space for urban nature. Soundings, 22, 137–150.

Author Biographies

Marc Grau-Solés, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Estudis de Doctorat en Psicologia Social. Investigador del Institut de Govern i Polítiques Públiques (IGOP) y miembro del GESCIT (Grup d’Estudis Socials de la Ciència i la Tecnologia). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Marc.Grau@uab.cat

Lupicinio Íñiguez-Rueda, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Doctor en Psicología Social por la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Catedrático de Psicología Social en el Departament de Psicologia Social (UAB). Miembro del GESCIT (Grup d’Estudis Socials de la Ciència i la Tecnologia) e IGOP (Institut de Govern i Polítiques Públiques). Lupicinio.iniguez@uab.cat

Joan Subirats, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Doctor en Ciencias Económicas por la Universitat de Barcelona. Catedrático de Ciencia Política en el Departament de Ciència Política i Dret Públic (UAB). Miembro del Institut de Govern i Polítiques Públiques (IGOP). Joan.Subirats@uab.cat

Published

2011-03-08

How to Cite

Grau-Solés, M., Íñiguez-Rueda, L., & Subirats, J. (2011). How to govern the complexity? Invitation to an hybrid and relational urban governance. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, 11(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v11n1.827

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.