The social construction of violence
Abstract
As a further contribution to understanding violence, we will present here some contributions that social psychology has made to the understanding of aggressive behavior and social violence. We do so from our disciplinary and academic perspective because it is the one we know best, but also because it will allow us to illustrate how to articulate analytical procedures from very different perspectives and with different approaches. And finally, because it allows us to illustrate the influences that the social, historical, and ideological context has on the understanding of any social process such as aggression and violence.
References
Bandura,A. (1976) Teoría del aprendizaje social. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1982.
Bandura,A. y Ribes,E. (1975) Modificación de conducta. Análisis de la agresión y la delincuencia. México: Trillas.
Bandura,A., Ross,D. y Ross,S.A. (1963) Imitation of film-mediated agressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66:3-11.
Borofsky,G.; Stollak,G. y Messé,L.(1971) Bystander reactions to physical assault: sex differences in reactions to physical assault. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7:313-318.
Brownmiller,S.(1975) Against our will: men, women and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Cherry,F. (1995) The 'stubborn particulars' of social psychology. London: Routledge.
Dollard,J.; Doob,L.; Miller,N.; Mowrer,O. y Sears,R. (1939) Frustration and Aggression. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Domènech,M. e Ibáñez,T, (1998) La Psicología Social como Crítica. Anthropos (En prensa)
Eibel-Eibesfeldt, I. (1973) El hombre preprogramado. Lo hereditario como factor determinante del comportamiento humano. Madrid: Alianza, 1983)
Foucault,M. (1975) Vigilar y castigar. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 1978.
Foucault,M. (1976)Historia de la sexualidad. La voluntad de saber. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 1980.
Freud,S. (1930) El malestar en la cultura. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1970.
Gergen,K.J. (1984) Agression as discourse. En A.Mummendey (Ed.) Social Psychology of Aggression. From Individual Behavior to Social Interaction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Pp.51-68)
Ibáñez,T. e Íñiguez,L. (Eds.) (1997) Critical Social Psychology. London: Sage.
Latané,B. y Darley,J.M. (1970) The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
Lorenz, K. (1963) Sobre la agresión. El pretendido mal. México: Siglo XXI, 1981.
Lubek,I. (1979) A brief social psychological analysis of research on aggression in social psychology. En A.R.Buss (Ed.) Psychology in Social Context. New York: Irvington.
Martín-Baró, I. (1983) Acción e ideología. San Salvador: UCA editores, 1996.
Muñoz,J. (1988) Psicología Social de la agresión. Análisis teórico y experimental. Tesis Doctoral. U.A.B.
Muñoz,J. (1990) El papel de las normas en la definición de la agresión. Boletín de Psicología 26:33-51.
Shotland,R.L. y Straw,M.K (1976) Bystander response to an assault: when a man attacks a woman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34:990-999.
Stainton-Rogers,R.; Stenner,P.; Gleason,K. y Stainton-Rogers,W. (1995) Social Psychology. A critical agenda. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2002 Miquel Domènech, Lupicinio Íñiguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
