Hybrid Psychology: The marriage of discourse analysis with neuroscience

Authors

  • Rom Harré Georgetown University

Abstract

As the 21st Century opened the controversial and unstable discipline of `academic psychology’ seemed to separating into two radically distinct and perhaps irreconcilable domains. Discursive psychology focused on the management of meaning in a world of norms while Neuropsychology focused on the investigation of brain and cognitive processes. These two domains can be reconciled in a hybrid science that brings them together into a synthesis more powerful than anything psychologists have achieved before. In this paper means Hybrid psychology depends on the intuition that while brains can be assimilated into the world of persons, people cannot be assimilated into the world of cell structures and molecular processes.
The project of setting up a hybrid science, in which the symbol using capacities of human beings are brought into a unified scheme with the organic aspects of members of the species homo sapiens, demands the dissolution of the mind-body problem, somehow setting it aside as an illusion, based on a mistaken presupposition.

Keywords

Hybrid Psychology, Discourse analysis, Neuroscience, Language, Mind

References

Bennett, Maxwell R. & Hacker, Peter M. S. (2007). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Bruner, Jerome S. (1986). Actual Minds. Possible World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Danziger, Kurt (1990). Constructing the Subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, Derek & Potter, Jonathan (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.

Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gibson, James J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Miflin.

Harré, Rom (2004). Cognitive Science: A Philosophical Introduction. London and 1000 Oaks: Sage.

Moghaddam, Fathali M. (2006). Performance capacity and performance style: Looking back and moving forward in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 16, 840-846.

Polanyi, Michael (1958). Personal Knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Ryle, Gilbert (1949). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

Shaver, Kelly G. (1985). The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility, and Blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Shweder, Richard A. (1991). Thinking through Cultures. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Published

2010-07-05

How to Cite

Harré, R. (2010). Hybrid Psychology: The marriage of discourse analysis with neuroscience. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, (18), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v0n18.665

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.