An old thinker to resignify a psychosocial category: George Mead and socialization
Abstract
In this article I pretend to provide conceptual lines to resignify socialization as a psychosocial category, from a productive perspective in order to situate the comprehension of subjectivation processes. I will review some reductionist and linear explanations found in certain approaches to socialization, and provide arguments to say that intersubjectivity is a prolific level to develop comprehension categories that include different dimensions. In this direction, I take into consideration some of George Mead´s psychosocial categories, given the fact his work is central in proposing an ontology of intersubjectivity. There are two main issues that I try to articulate throughout the analyses of Mead's categories: i. the symbolic process in which a person's constitution arise through communicative exchanges at intersubjective action. ii. the plurality of perspectives and behavior expectancies that operate as a reference to actions and allows, from my point of view, to conceptualize socialization as a conflictive process of social differentiation.
Keywords
Socialization, Intersubjectivity, Differentiation, George MeadPublished
2010-03-01
How to Cite
Tomasini, M. E. (2010). An old thinker to resignify a psychosocial category: George Mead and socialization. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, (17), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v0n17.668
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Copyright (c) 2010 Marina Edith Tomasini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.