Origins of the #primaveravalenciana mobilizations. An analysis of the most influential social actors on Twitter

Authors

  • Juan Pecourt Gracia Universitat de València
  • Alícia Villar Aguilés Universitat de València

Abstract

Twitter publics have become consolidated research objects. The main aim of this article is to make a contribution to this research current by analysing the social conditions that gave shape to the hashtag #primaveravalenciana. In order to do this, this study shall follow an analysis of the early tweets giving shape to this phenomenon. This approach shall stablish a participant's typology, identifying the most influent actors and pursuying a content analysis of relevant micro-messages which pushed forward the hashtag's viral expansion in the next few days. Against theories which tend to minimise the social distinction of digital actors, data analysis shows that the hashtag's origins were in a homogeneous group of micro-bloggers, coming from well-defined professional strata, who has the necessary skills and institutional connections to encourage and expand the #primaveravalenciana phenomenon.

Keywords

Social Media, Twitter, Social Movements, Student Protests

Author Biographies

Juan Pecourt Gracia, Universitat de València

Departament de Sociologia i Antropologia Social

Profesor contratado doctor interino

Alícia Villar Aguilés, Universitat de València

Departament de Sociologia i Antropologia Social

Profesora Ayudante Doctora

Published

2018-06-06

How to Cite

Pecourt Gracia, J., & Villar Aguilés, A. (2018). Origins of the #primaveravalenciana mobilizations. An analysis of the most influential social actors on Twitter. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, 18(2), e-1857. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1857

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
804
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles