Axiologies to develop new ideas on Intellectual Property
Abstract
A philosophical approach to copyleft is a big deal. It brings together copyrights, TICs and, sometimes, the democratic model itself. Copyleft is the device that conducts all these social empowerments articulated on this new society of knowledge. However, it is needed to make a research on the origins of these new ideas and the implications that discourses and practices of the pioneering collectives have had from the beginning. We have pick out two of the main actors of the field of the production of Free Software: the Free Software Foundation and the Open Source Initiative. Through the analysis of the discourses we will elucidate if we can appreciate differences in significance of "free work" notion for both actors, the propositions that underlie its main ideas and the factual possibility of the copyleft as to its subversive perspective for the discourse of the traditional operators of cultural market.Keywords
Copyleft, NTICs, Free Software, Intellectual PropertyReferences
Berry, David (2008). Copy, rip, burn: the politics of copyleft and open source. London: Pluto Press.
Foucault, Michel (1999/2008). El orden del discurso. Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.
Free Softawere Foundation (2013). Current Campaigns. Recuperado de: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns
Free Software Foundation (2015a). The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom and to defend the rights of all free software users. Recuperado de: https://www.fsf.org/about/
Free Software Foundation (2015b). Free software is software that gives you the user the freedom to share, study and modify it. We call this free software because the user is free. Recuperado de: http://www.fsf.org/about/what-is-free-software
GNU (2015). What is Free Software? The Free Software definition. Recuperado de: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#content
Martínez Cabezudo, Fernando (2014). Copyright y copyleft. Modelos para la Ecología de los Saberes. Sevilla: Aconcagua Libros.
Nozick, Robert (1988/1990). Anarquía, Estado y Utopía. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Open Source Inititive (2015). The open source definition. Recuperado de: http://opensource.org/docs/osd
Punt, Michael (1998). Accidental Machines: The Impact of Popular Participation in Computer Technology. Design Issues, 14(1), 54-80.
Raymond, Eric. (1997). The Cathedral and the Bazar. 12(3), 23-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12130-999-1026-0
Raymond, Eric. (2004). The art of Unix programming. Boston: Preason Education Inc.
Raymond, Eric. (2011). Sex, software, politics, and firearms. Life's simple pleasures… Recuperado de: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=3850
Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996, de 12 de abril, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, regularizando, aclarando y armonizando las disposiciones legales vigentes sobre la materia. (BOE del 22.04.1996), Extraído el 30 de junio de 2010, de https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1996-8930
Rendueles, Cesar (2013). Sociofobia. El cambio político en la era de la utopía digital. Madrid: Capitan Swing.
Reunión de ovejas electrónicas (2006). Ciberactivismo. Sobre usos políticos y sociales de la Red. Barcelona: Virus Editorial.
Stallman, Richard (2004). Software Libre para una sociedad libre. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
Taylor, Astra (2014). The people’s Platform. Taking back Power and Culture in the Digital Era. London: Fourth Estate.
Tiemann, Michell (2009). History of OSI. Recuperado de: http://www.opensource.org/history
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2015 Fernando Martínez Cabezudo, Rafael Rodríguez Prieto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
