The body at risk

Authors

  • Marina Guzzo Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

Abstract

This article looks at the notion of 'risk' in the construction of the body as a spectacle. Its specific focus is on the body of the aerial acrobat and the production of an aesthetic of risk in the circus. The aim of the article is to understand the ways in which the illusion of risk is created in the circus, and how this fits into the framework of adventure-risk in society at large. In understanding how risk is created, we shall see that every risk has its counterpart in strategies of safety. We shall see that modernity's quest for thrills is linked to its concern for means of ensuring safety, though technologies of prevention, insurance cover, and rigorous training programmes to ensure the technically perfect execution of skills. It is this concern for security which, paradoxically, makes an aesthetics of risk meaningful. Our research examines the point at which the aesthetics of risk is embodied in the body of the acrobat. We use a variety of research methods, including observation, field diaries, photography, image-searches, interviews and documents in the public domain. The questions we address are the following: what are the bodily risks of acrobatic shows? How are such risks used? How is it that sensitivity to bodily practices has changed so much? Our analytic path starts by contextualising the notion of risk, then proceeds to characterise the spectacle of the circus, and continues through an account of the technical aspects of acrobatic skill. We arrive ultimately at our end-point: the 'aerial acrobat', which, in embodying the illusion of risk and the transcendence of human limits, stands as an example of contemporary subjectivity.

Keywords

Body, Risk, Acrobat

References

Beck, U.(1998) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Cambridge, UK: PolityPress. (Risikogesellschaft. Frankfut:Suhrkamp, 1986)

Bernstein, R.(1997) Contra os deuses – a notável história do risco, São Paulo: Objetiva.

Bibliothèque Historique de la Ville De Paris (2002)Regard Sur le Cirque. Paris: Paris Bibliothèques ed.

Bibliothèque Nationale de France Noëlle Giret (2001). Les Arts du cirqe. Paris: Anthèse.

Deleuze, G.(2002) Espinosa: Filosofia Prática. São Paulo: Escuta.

Douglas, M.(1992) Risk and Blame. London: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1999)Microfísica do Poder. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.

Lévy, P.(1996) O que é o virtual? São Paulo: Editora 34.

Lins, D. Metafísica da carne: que pode um corpo. In: Lins, D. e Gadelha, S. (orgs) (2002) Nietzsche e Deleuze: que pode o corpo. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará.

Menegon, V. M.(2003) A linguagem dos riscos na reprodução humana assistida. Tese de Doutorado em Psicologia Socia, PUC-SP.

Paz, O.(1988) O Monogramático. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara.

Soares, C. (org) (1998)Corpo e História. Campinas: Autores Associados.

Spink, M. J.(2001) Trópico dos discursos sobre riscos: risco aventura como metáfora da modernidade tardia. Cadernos de Saúde pública.

Spink, M.J.(2000) Os contornos do risco na modernidade relfexiva:contribuições da psicologia social. In: Psicologia e Sociedade. Vol 12, no.1.

Spink, M. J.,& LIMA, H. Rigor e visibilidade: a explicitação dos passos da interpretação.In: SPINK, M.J.(2000) (org) Práticas discursivas e produção de sentidos no cotidiano. São Paulo, Cortez.

Spink, P. (2003) Pesquisa de campo e psicologia social: uma perspectiva pós-construcionista.In: Psicologia e Sociedade, 15(2): 18-42.

Vigarello, G.(1998) A história do estupro. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.

Weineck, J.(1999) O treinamento ideal. São Paulo: Manole.

Published

2004-11-01

How to Cite

Guzzo, M. (2004). The body at risk. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, 1(6), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v1n6.148

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.