Indexación y Factor de Impacto: La Academia y sus cajas negras
Resumen
El objetivo de este artículo es analizar la construcción del Factor de Impacto (FI) de las publicaciones científicas como proceso en el que se relacionan dimensiones técnicas y sociales. Las dimensiones técnicas remiten a decisiones y debates en el campo de la bibliometría. Las dimensiones sociales aluden al contexto sociohistórico en el que se encuadran las dimensiones técnicas, vinculadas a concepciones específicas de la ciencia, la política científica o la gestión del conocimiento y las universidades. Así, el FI es examinado como una invención sociotécnica. Conceptualmente, me serviré de la idea de caja negra para ilustrar la construcción y objetivación del FI como proceso en el que se oscurecen los componentes sociales, culturales e intelectuales que intervienen en su constitución.Palabras clave
Publicación científica, Administración de la ciencia, Bibliología, Factor de impacto, Sociología del conocimientoCitas
Alonso, Luis Enrique & Fernández Rodríguez, Carlos Jesús (2012). El nuevo debate sobre el gerencialismo. ¿Innovación creativa o maquiavelismo financiero? En Luis Enrique Alonso & Carlos Jesús Rodríguez (Eds.), La financiarización de las relaciones salariales. Una perspectiva internacional (pp. 104-126). Los libros de la Catarata.
Archambault, Èric & Vincent Larivière (2009). History of the Journal Impact Factor. Contingencies and Consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 635-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x
Akrich, Madeleine (1997). The De-Scription of Technical Objects. In Wiebe E. Bijker & John Law (Ed.), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 205-224). The MIT Press.
Aksnes, Dag W.; Langfeldt, Liv & Wouters, Paul. (2019). Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
Baumgarten, Maria (2004). Avaliação e gestão de ciência e tecnología: Estado e colectividade científica. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 70, 33-56. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.1046
Bornmann, Lutz & Haunschild, Robin (2017). Does Evaluative Scientometrics Lose Its Main Fous on Scientific Quality by the New Orientation Towards Societal Impact? Scientometrics, 110(2), 937-943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2200-2
Briggle, Adam Robert (2014). Opening the Black Box: The Social Outcomes of Scientific Research. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782584
Cronin, Blaise (1981). The Need for a Theory of Citing. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026703
Davies, Philip M. (2009). Reward or Persuasion? The Battle to Define the Meaning of a Citation. Learned Publishing, 21, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108x378712
De Bellis, Nicola (2014). History and Evolution of (Biblio)Metrics. In Blaise Cronin & Cassidy R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond Bibliometrics. Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (pp. 23-44). The MIT Press.
Donovan, Claire (2007). The Qualitative Future of Research Evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X256538
DORA (2013). Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), Proposal for Thomson Reuters to Modify the Journal Impact Factor. https://sfdora.org/read
European Commision Expert Group on Altmetrics (2017). Next Generation Metrics: Responsible Metrics and Evaluation for Open Science. European Commision, Directore-General for Research and Innovation
Fernández Rodríguez, Carlos Jesús (2007). El discurso del management: tiempo y narración. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Fleck, Christian (2013). The Impact Factor Fetichism. European Journal of Sociology, 54(02), 327-357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975613000167
Frith, Uta (2015). Slow Science. http://frithmind.org/blog/2015/10/11/slow-science/
Garfield, Eugene (1972a). Citation as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Essays of an Information Scientist, 1, 527-544.
Garfield, Eugene (1972b). Citation Indexing – Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities. John Wiley and Sons.
Garfield, Eugene (1979). Is Citation Analysis a Legitimate Evaluation Tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019306
Garfield, Eugene (2006). The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90
Glänzel, Wolfgang & Moed, Henk F. (2002). Journal Impact Measures in Bibliometric Research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014848323806
Haustein, Stefanie; Bowman, Timothy D. & Costas, Rodrigo (2016). Interpretating Altmetrics: Viewing Acts on Social Media Through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories. In Cassidy R. Sugimoto (Ed.), Theories of Infometrics and Scholarly Communication. A Festchrift in Honor of Blaise Cronin (pp. 372-405). De Gruyter.
Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; Ricjke, Sarah de & Rafols, Ismael (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429-431.
Kinouchi, Renato Rodrigues (2014). Scientometrics: The Project for a Science of Science Transformed into an Industry of Measurement. Scientiae Studia, 12, 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-31662014000400008
Latour, Bruno (1987/1992). Ciencia en acción. Cómo seguir a los científicos e ingenieros a través de la sociedad. Labor.
Latour, Bruno (1999/2001). La esperanza de Pandora. Ensayos sobre la realidad de los estudios de la ciencia. Gedisa.
Lukkonen, Terttu (1997). Why Latour’s Theory of Citations Has Been Ignored by the Bibliometric Community? Discussion of Sociological Interpretations of Citation Analysis. Scientometrics, 38(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461121
Mattedi, Marcos Antônio & Spiess, Maiko Rafael (2017). The Evaluation of Scientific Productivity. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, 24(3), 623-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702017000300005.
Merton, Robert K. (1979). Foreword. In Eugene Garfield. Citation Indexing – Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities (pp. v-ix). John Wiley and Sons.
Oppenheim, Charles (1995). The Connection Between Citation Counts and the 1992 Research Assesment Exercise Ratings for British Library and Information Science University Departments. Journal of Documentation, 51(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026940
Priem, Jason (2014). Altmetrics. In Blaise Cronin y Cassidy R. Sugimoto (eds.). Beyond Bibliometrics. Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. The MIT Press.
Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul & Neylon, Cameron (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Recuperado el 24 de julio de 2019, http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
Santos Pereira, Tiago (2004). Processos de governação da ciência: o debate em torno do modelo de financiamiento das unidades de investigação. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 70, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.1044
Sharpe, Matthew & Turner, Kirk (2018). Bibliopolitics. The History of Notation and the Birth of the Citational Academic Subject. Foucault Studies, 25, 146-173. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v25i2.5578
Shove, Elizabeth (2003). Confort, Cleanliness and Convenience. The Social Organization of Normality. Berg Publishers.
Sud, Pardeep & Thelwall, Mike (2014). Evaluating Altmetrics. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1131-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2
Taylor, Mike (2013). Exploring the Boundaries. How Altmetrics Can Expand Our Vision of Scholarly Communication and Social Impact. Information Standars Quarterly, 25(2), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.05
Wade, Nicholas (1975). Citation Analysis. A New Tool for Science Administrators. Science, 188, 429-432. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.188.4187.429
Woolgar, Steve (1991). Beyond the citation debate: towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy. Science and Public Policy, 18(5), 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/18.5.319
Wouters, Paul (1998). The Signs of Science. Scientometrics, 41(1-2), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457980
Wouters, Paul (1999). The Citation Culture. Tesis Doctoral sin publicar. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2021 Fernando Ampudia de Haro
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
