Making the Anthropocene wilder. Rewilding and domestication

Authors

Abstract

There is increasing support for a proposal to designate our age as the "Anthropocene". It highlights the growing role of Homo sapiens in the transformation of the planet on a global scale, as if human actions were a geological force. There are those who embrace this situation, because they conceive the relationship of our species with nature as a combat, the result of which must be the complete domestication of Gaia (and perhaps our own self-domestication) through technological advances. However, others want to make our surroundings and ourselves more savage through intensive "rewilding" programs. In the background is a growing conflict between humanist and transhumanist visions. My main objective in this work is to suggest a peaceful coexistence of domestication and rewilding in order to face the very serious problems that are coming with the Anthropocene.

Keywords

Anthropocene, Domestication, Rewilding, Transhumanism

References

Abram, David (2010). Becoming Animal. An Earthly Cosmology. Nueva York: Random House.

Bennett, Joseph R.; Maloney, Richard F.; Steeves, Tammy E.; Brazill-Boast, James; Possingham, Hugh P. & Seddon, Philip J. (2017). Spending limited resources on de-extinction could lead to net biodiversity loss. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1, 0053. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0053

Boltanski, Luc & Chiapello, Eve (1999/2002). El nuevo espíritu del capitalismo. Madrid: Akal.

Brüne, Martin (2007). On human self-domestication, psychiatry, and eugenics. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-2-21

Cohen, Shlomo (2014). The Ethics of De-Extinction. Nanoethics, 8(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0201-2

Corlett, Richard T. (2016). Restoration, Reintroduction, and Rewilding in a Changing World. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(6), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.017

Crutzen, Paul J. (2006). Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Climatic change, 77(3), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y

de Cózar Escalante, José Manuel (2014). ¿Una cosmopolítica de lo salvaje? La composición técnica del mundo natural. Revista Pléyade 14, 97-118. Recuperado de http://www.revistapleyade.cl/wp-content/uploads/14-de-C%C3%B3zar.pdf

de Cózar Escalante, José Manuel (2016). La biología sintética y sus promesas por cumplir. Isegoría, 55, 485-501. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2016.055.05

Diéguez, Antonio (2017). Transhumanismo. La búsqueda tecnológica del mejoramiento humano. Barcelona: Herder.

Donlan, C. Josh (2014). De-extinction in a crisis discipline. Frontiers of biogeography, 6(1), 25-28.

European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2010). Ethics of Synthetic Biology (Comisión Europea, Bruselas, 18 noviembre). Recuperado de https://www.erasynbio.eu/lw_resource/datapool/_items/item_15/ege__opinion25_en.pdf

Gibbons, Ann (2014). How we tamed ourselves – and became modern. Science 24, 405-406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.346.6208.405

Giese, Bernd; Pade, Christian; Wigger, Henning & von Gleich, Arnim (Eds.) (2015). Synthetic Biology. Character and Impact. Berlin: Springer.

Grunwald, Armin (2015). Synthetic Biology as Technoscience and the EEE Concept of Responsibility. In Bernd Giese, Christian Pade, Henning Wigger & Arnim von Gleich (Eds.), Synthetic Biology. Character and Impact (pp. 249-265). Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02783-8_13

Harari, Yuval Noah (2014). Sapiens. De animales a dioses. Barcelona: Debate.

Harari, Yuval Noah (2016). Homo Deus. Breve historia del mañana. Barcelona: Debate.

Haraway, Donna. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Hare, Brian & Vanessa Woods (2013). The genius of dogs. New York: Penguin Group.

Hare, Brian; Wobber, Victoria & Wrangham, Richard (2012). The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression. Animal Behaviour, 83(3), 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.007

Jameson, Fredric (1989). Documentos de cultura, documentos de barbarie. La narrativa como acto socialmente simbólico. Madrid: Visor.

Kurzweil, Ray (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Nueva York: Penguin.

Lorimer, Jamie; Sandom, Chris; Jepson, Paul; Doughty, Chris; Barua, Maan & Keith J. Kirby (2015). Rewilding: Science, Practice, and Politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 39-62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021406

Mckibben, Bill (1989). The End of Nature. New York: Random House LLC.

Nicolescu, Basarab (2016). The Dark Side of Technological Singularity: New Barbarism. Cybernetics and Human Knowing. 23(4), 77-81.

Nordmann, Alfred (2015). Synthetic Biology at the Limits of Science. In Bernd Giese; Christian Pade; Henning Wigger & Arnim von Gleich (Eds.), Synthetic Biology. Character and Impact (pp. 31-58). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02783-8_2

Oksanen, Markku & Helena Siipi (Eds.) (2014). The Ethics of Animal Re-creation and Modification: Reviving, Rewilding, Restoring. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ortega y Gasset, José (1939/2004). Meditación de la técnica. Madrid: Alianza.

Sandler, Ronald (2014). The Ethics of Reviving Long Extinct Species. Conservation Biology, 28(2). 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12198

Schmidt, Jan C. (2015). Synthetic Biology as Late-Modern Technology. Inquiring into the Rhetoric and Reality of a New Technoscientific Wave. In Bernd Giese; Christian Pade; Henning Wigger & Arnim von Gleich (Eds.), Synthetic Biology. Character and Impact (pp. 1-30). Berlin: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02783-8_1

Seddon, Philip (2017). The ecology of de-extinction, Functional Ecology. Special Feature, 31, 992-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12856

Serrano Montes, José Luis; Gómez Zotano, José & Olmedo Cobo, José Antonio (2017). El resilvestramiento y el retorno de la fauna: enfoques, experiencias e implicaciones paisajísticas. Cuadernos Geográficos, 56(3), 136-161. Recuperado de http://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/cuadgeo/article/view/5438/585

Shapiro, Beth (2017). Pathways to de‐extinction: how close can we get to resurrection of an extinct species? Functional Ecology, 31(5), 996-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12705

Sloterdijk, Peter (1999/2003). Normas para el parque humano. Una respuesta a la 'Carta sobre el humanismo' de Heidegger. Madrid: Siruela.

Sloterdijk, Peter (2016/2018). ¿Qué sucedió en el siglo XX? Madrid: Siruela.

Svenning, Jens Christian; Pedersen, Pil B. M.; Donlan, C. Josh; Ejrnæs, Rasmus; Faurby, Søren; Galetti, Mauro… Frans W. M. (2016). Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 898–906. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502556112

“Woolly Mammoth on Verge of Resurrection, Scientists Reveal” (2017, 16 de febrero). The Guardian. Recuperado de https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/16/woolly-mammoth-resurrection-scientists

Zerzan, John (2008/2016). El crepúsculo de las máquinas. Madrid: los libros de la catarata.

Author Biography

José Manuel de Cózar Escalante, Universidad de La Laguna

Profesor titular de la Universidad de La Laguna desde 1995. Doctor en Filosofía por la Universitat de València en 1989. Sus intereses académicos giran en torno a los estudios de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad y la filosofía ambiental. Más específicamente, lleva años investigando y publicando sobre las implicaciones epistemológicas y sociales de la nanotecnología y su convergencia con otras tecnologías.

Published

2019-02-02

How to Cite

de Cózar Escalante, J. M. (2019). Making the Anthropocene wilder. Rewilding and domestication. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, 19(1), e-2214. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2214

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
584
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles