The encounters that compose the research craft

Authors

Abstract

This paper discusses ethical and political dimensions of research, which is taken as social practice. To perform this research, with two teams in different regions of Brazil (Northeast and Southeast), building a truly collaborative work was an imperative task. The work process is problematized in a research involving women activists of two Brazilian social movements. The research process is discussed in four specific encouters. The first concerns the process of co-elaborating the project and the challenges of gathering distinct research interests. The second focuses on the daily challenges of staff in working with the theme of death, but also the synergy needed to work remotely. The third encounter discusses the relationship between researchers and participants, highlighting ethical and political dilemmas. The fourth and final encounter to be discussed the constraints posed by working with the theme of death, echoing among the participants and another researchers.

Keywords

Qualitative Research, Reflexivity, Researcher-Participant Relationship

Author Biographies

Luciana Kind, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)

Doutora em Saúde Coletiva (IMS/UERJ). Professora do Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Editora da revista Psicologia & Sociedade e membro do Conselho Editorial da Editora PUC Minas. Coordenadora do grupo de pesquisa Narrativas, Gênero e Saúde (Nages).

Rosineide Cordeiro, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)

Doutora em Psicologia Social (PUC-SP). Professora do Departamento de Serviço Social e do Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Integrante do Grupo de Pesquisa Narrativas, Gênero e Saúde e do Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Poder, Cultura e Práticas Coletivas (GEPCOL-UFPE).

Published

2016-07-05

How to Cite

Kind, L., & Cordeiro, R. (2016). The encounters that compose the research craft. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, 16(2), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1835

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.