Articulating experiences of reciclying associative work in Great Buenos Aires (2004-2014)

Authors

  • Cecilia Cross Centro de Innovación de los Trabajadores

Abstract

This paper addresses the implications of the theoretical approach we choose to analyze the discourses of stakeholders in qualitative fieldwork. As part of this reflection I tackled the theoretical assumptions behind “action” versus “experience articulation” analytical traditions. The evidence presented was collected from 2004 to 2014 while accompanying the design, construction and management of a “social plant” for residues classification placed on “Reconquista Area”, in northeast of Great Buenos Aires. Along this decade I combined traditional qualitative approach with action research, which permitted to register the changes and transformations in the discourses about the “social plant”. My hypothesis is that these variations can be explained not only by context´s fluctuations but transformations in social actor’s subjectivities, which are reflected both in their positions among themselves and the narratives about their own stories.

Keywords

Articulating Experience, Action, Employability, Urban Solid Residue Recycling

Author Biography

Cecilia Cross, Centro de Innovación de los Trabajadores

Doctora en Ciencias Sociales (UBA). Me desempeño como Investigadora Adjunta del CONICET en el CITRA. Soy Profesora Asociada Regular del Instituto de Ingeniería y Agronomía de la UNAJ y Secretaria de Investigación de la UMET. Investigo implementación de políticas sociales, innovación tecnológica en el lugar de trabajo y trabajo asociativo.  

Published

2016-07-05

How to Cite

Cross, C. (2016). Articulating experiences of reciclying associative work in Great Buenos Aires (2004-2014). Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, 16(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1624

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
438
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles