Cultural complexity
Abstract
At the beginning of 2007, something attracted the attention of public opinion: 600 boarders of “La Villa de las niñas de Chalco” (a girls boarding school), presented symptoms like: dizziness, nausea, vomits and muscular problems. Once organic factors where ruled out and with the support of “medical science” an official version of the facts was constructed, backed by “science” and “experts”. “Academics” of different Mexican institutions appeared on TV giving their opinions on the subject, and surprisingly their “points of view” on the case were as implausible as those of health authorities. Even, as I will show, the “academics' versions” ended giving, maybe without wanting it, verisimilitude to the “official version” of the Ministry of Health. Interestingly, the explanations that were produced to justify the existence of that “facts” were attached, with romantic fervour, to the hypnotical-epidemiological ones developed within “mass psychology” of late XIXth century and beginnings of XXth century. This essay could be useful to understand the strange case of “La Villa de las niñas” but also to review the manner in which versions, descriptions and explanations are constructed and circulate in particular ways. Also, to understand the way in which these versions, descriptions and explanations circulate will allow us to understand the cultural complexity of any given situation.Keywords
Mass hysteria, Versions, Descriptions, Explanations, Cultural complexityReferences
Álvaro Estramiana, José Luis (1995). Psicología Social: perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Berger, John (Ed.) (1972/2000). Modos de ver. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Blanco, Amalio (1988). Cinco tradiciones en psicología social. Madrid: Morata.
Cazeneuve, Jean (1972). Sociología del rito. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Collins, Randall (2009). Cadenas de rituales de interacción. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Coromines, Joan (1961/2008). Breve diccionario etimológico de la lengua castellana. Madrid: Gredos.
Eco, Umberto (2007). Ciencia, tecnología y magia. En Umberto Eco (Comp.) A paso de cangrejo (pp.123-131). México D.F.: Debate.
Fernández Christlieb, Pablo (1994). La Psicología Colectiva un fin de siglo más tarde: su disciplina, su conocimiento, su realidad. México: Colegio de Michoacán – Anthropos.
Glowinski, Michal. (1991/2006). La neohabla (Un reconocimiento). Criterios, 35, 288-307.
Harré, Rom. (2006). Key thinkers in psychology. London: Sage.
Le Bon, Gustave. (1895/1995). Psicología de las masas. Madrid: Morata.
Pollner, Melvin (1974/2000). El razonamiento mundano. En Félix Díaz (Ed.) Sociologías de la Situación (pp.131-163), Madrid: La Piqueta.
Potter, Jonathan (1998). La representación de la realidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Ritzer, Georges (2000). Teoría Sociológica Moderna. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Sacks, Harvey (2000). La máquina de hacer inferencias en Félix Díaz (Ed.) Sociologías de la Situación (pp.61-81). Madrid: La Piqueta.
Segalen, Martin (2005). Ritos y rituales contemporáneos. Madrid: Alianza.
Singer, Margaret y Lalich, Janja (2003). Las sectas entre nosotros. Barcelona: Gedisa.
van Doren, Charles. (2006). Breve historia del saber. Barcelona: Planeta.
Watzlawick, Paul (1981). Profecías que se autocumplen. En Paul Watzlawick et. al. La realidad inventada, Barcelona: Gedisa, 82-98.
White, Leslie Alvin (1949/1982). La ciencia de la cultura. Barcelona: Paidós.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2010 Juan Soto Ramírez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
