Telework and daily life: Its pros and cons for work-life balance

Authors

  • Carmen Pérez Sánchez Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
  • Ana María Gálvez Mozo Universitat Oberta de Catalunya

Abstract

In this article we discuss whether telework constitutes a useful work-life balance strategy for women teleworkers with dependants. From our analysis we show that the discourse of the women interviewed about telework is not homogeneous, compact or linear, but includes plenty of contradictions, paradoxes and tensions. This fact reinforces telework’s enormous polysemy: it liberates and enslaves, it is a trap and an opportunity, it fulfills and can mean self-sacrifice. But, despite this rich complexity, our women informants agree on one particular matter: telework’s risks and possibly pernicious effects cannot hide either its advantages for work-life balance or the benefits it brings, at least in some cases, to one's personal life.

Keywords

Telework, Work-life balance, Gender

Author Biographies

Carmen Pérez Sánchez, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya

Carmen Pérez Sánchez es investigadora del Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) de la Universitat Oberta (UOC) donde está realizando su tesis doctoral sobre el impacto del teletrabajo en el ámbito doméstico y familiar. Es diplomada en Trabajo Social por la Universidad de Oviedo y licenciada en Sociología por la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Ana María Gálvez Mozo, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya

Ana Mª Gálvez Mozo es profesora agregada de psicología de las organizaciones y el trabajo en la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), donde coordina un línea de investigación sobre Organizaciones, Conciliación y TIC’s.

Published

2009-05-02

How to Cite

Pérez Sánchez, C., & Gálvez Mozo, A. M. (2009). Telework and daily life: Its pros and cons for work-life balance. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, (15), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v0n15.597

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
143
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles