Toward Scientifically Informed Protocols: The Case of Child Sexual Abuse
Abstract
Achieving justice in child sexual abuse (CSA) cases involves enormous challenges, as the characteristics of the crime often make it difficult to obtain material evidence or witness statements. This highlights the importance of obtaining reliable victim testimonies through interview protocols based on solid scientific evidence. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate 10 forensic interview protocols in CSA cases widely used in Latin America, contrasting them with the scientific evidence on the psychology of memory and psychology of testimony of the last decade. Based on an exhaustive analysis, approaches congruent with the scientific evidence are identified, as well as inconsistencies and absences. Specific recommendations are proposed to update and improve these protocols, with the purpose of strengthening their effectiveness in the protection of minors and in the administration of justice.
Keywords
Childhood, Memory, Sexual abuse, InterviewsReferences
Altman, Christopher; Schreiber Compo, Nadja; McQuiston, Dawn; Hagsand, Angelica, & Cervera, Jiselle. (2018). Witnesses’ memory for events and faces under elevated levels of intoxication. Memory, 26, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1445758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1445758
Anderson, Jennifer; Ellefson, Julie; Lashley, Jodi; Miller, Anne; Olinger, Sara; Russell, Amy, & Weigman, Judy. (2010). Protocolo RATAC® para entrevistas forenses de Cornerhouse. Thomas M. Cooley Journal of Practical and Clinical Law, 12(2), 193–331. https://www.mpfn.gob.pe/escuela/contenido/actividades/docs/3318_sustento_protocolo_satac___cornerhouse.pdf
Arce, Ramón. (2015). El Sistema de Evaluación Global en casos de violencia de género: Huella psíquica y testimonio. Informació Psicològica, 9(Mayo–Agosto), 19–35. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3641534
Arce, Ramón; Selaya, Adriana; Sanmarco, Jéssica, & Fariña, Francisca. (2023). Implanting rich autobiographical false memories: Meta-analysis for forensic practice and judicial judgment making. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 23(4), 100386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100386
Blanco, Alejandra. (2016). Descripción de la metodología de evaluación pericial CAVAS INSCRIM. En Policía de Investigación de Chile (Ed.), Huellas. Cuadernos crimidinámica y fenómenos emergentes (pp. 14–32). Santillana del Pacífico S.A.
Brady, Timothy; Robinson, Maria; Williams, Jamala, & Wixted, John. (2023). Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(2), 421-449. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02179-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02179-w
Brainerd, Charles, & Reyna, Valerie. (1990). Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review, 10(1), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(90)90003-M DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(90)90003-M
Brainerd, Charles, & Reyna, Valerie. (2019). Fuzzy-trace theory, false memory, and the law. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218797143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218797143
Brubacher, Sonja, & Powell, Martine. (2019). Best-practice interviewing spans many contexts. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.07.007
Burrows, William. (2017). A word of gratitude. Missiology, 45(1), 119–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091829616687709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0091829616687709
Caso, Mercedes; Arch, Mila; Jarne, Adolfo, & Molina, Asunción. (2011). Guía práctica de exploración de menores. Editorial Jurídica Sepín.
Charman, Steve, & Quiroz, Vanessa. (2016). Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000197
Código Procesal Penal de la Nación. Ley 26.842 de 2012. 27 de diciembre de 2012 (Argentina).
Delgado Ramos, Enrique; Berrocal-Aragonés, Gabriela, & Uribe-Bravo, Karla Anamaría. (2023). Superando las trampas de la memoria: 23 aportes para declaraciones en casos de violencia sexual. Psicoperspectivas, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol22-Issue3-fulltext-2908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol22-Issue3-fulltext-2908
Diamond, Nicholas; Armson, Michael, & Levine, Brian. (2020). The truth is out there: Accuracy in recall of verifiable real-world events. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1544–1556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620954812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620954812
Dilevski, Natalia; Paterson, Helen, & van Golde, Celine. (2020). Investigating the effect of emotional stress on adult memory for single and repeated events. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000248
Escobar Antezano, Carlos (2021). La cámara Gesell como medio de prueba en el ordenamiento procesal peruano. Advocatus, 39, 315–338. https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2021.n39.5137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2021.n39.5137
Fritzley, Heather; Lindsay, Rod, & Lee, Kang. (2013). Young children’s response tendencies toward yes–no questions concerning actions. Child Development, 84(2), 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12006
García-Márquez, Jesús. (2022). El análisis del testimonio desde una concepción racionalista de la prueba. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Penales, 5(17), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.57042/rmcp.v5i17.539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57042/rmcp.v5i17.539
Godoy, Verónica, & Higueras Cortés, Lorenzo. (2005). Aplicación forense de la entrevista cognitiva: Descripción, evolución y situación actual. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 15(1), 41–54. https://journals.copmadrid.org/apj/art/c26820b8a4c1b3c2aa868d6d57e14a79
Greenspan, Rachel, & Loftus, Elizabeth. (2020). Eyewitness confidence malleability: Misinformation as post-identification feedback. Law and Human Behavior, 44(3), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000369
Greenstein, Michael, & Franklin, Nancy. (2020). Anger increases susceptibility to misinformation. Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000489
Gudjonsson, Gisli; Vagni, Monia, & Maiorano, Daniela. (2020). The relationship between trauma symptoms and immediate and delayed suggestibility in children who have been sexually abused. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1554
Hershkowitz, Irit; Lamb, Michael; Katz, Carmit, & Malloy, Lindsay. (2015). Does enhanced rapport-building alter the dynamics of investigative interviews with suspected victims of intra-familial abuse? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9136-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9136-8
Huaynatty, Nanci, & Paredes, Erika. (2021). Eficacias y deficiencias en la entrevista única de cámara Gesell, en delitos de violación sexual de menores, Ancash 2019–2020 [Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad Cesar Vallejo]. https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12692/72071
Jiménez Cortés, Cristina, & Martín Alonso, C. (2006). Valoración del testimonio en abuso sexual infantil (ASI). Cuadernos de Medicina Forense, 43–44, 83–102. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=s1135-76062006000100007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1135-76062006000100007
Juárez, José Ramón. (2011). Evaluación del relato del niño víctima de abuso sexual: Credibilidad, sugestionabilidad, entrevista y análisis criterial. En Irene Intebi (Ed.), Proteger, reparar, penalizar: Evaluación de las sospechas de abuso sexual infantil (pp. 241–247). Granica.
Juárez, José Ramón, & Álvarez, Fernando (Coords.). (2018). Evaluación psicológica forense de los abusos y maltratos a niños, niñas y adolescentes. Asociación de Psicólogos Forenses de la Administración de Justicia. https://copmelilla.org/descargas/pdf/guiebuenaspracticasymaltratoinfantil.pdf
Klemfuss, Zoe, & Ceci, Stephen. (2012). Legal and psychological perspectives on children’s competence to testify in court. Developmental Review, 32(3), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.005
Krähenbühl, Sarah, & Blades, Mark. (2006). The effect of interviewing techniques on young children’s responses to questions. Child: Care, Health and Development, 32(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00608.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00608.x
Lamb, Michael; Orbach, Yael; Hershkowitz, Irit; Esplin, Phillip, & Horowitz, Dvora. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(11–12), 1201–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
Laney, Cara, & Loftus, Elizabeth. (2023). Eyewitness testimony and memory biases. Australasian Policing, 15(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.945934383835696
Lawson, Monica, & London, Kamala. (2017). Children’s memory for conversations after a 1-year delay. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.001
Ley 30920 de 2019. Por la cual declara de interés público y prioridad nacional la implementación progresiva de cámaras Gesell en todas las fiscalías provinciales penales, de familia o mixtas de las provincias de los distritos fiscales y juzgados de familia de los distritos judiciales del país, a fin de garantizar la actuación oportuna de las diligencias que sirvan como medios probatorios idóneos en los procesos judiciales y evitar la revictimización en los casos de violencia sexual, familiar y trata de personas. 7 de marzo de 2019. D.O. No. 14858.
Loftus, Elizabeth. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
Loftus, Elizabeth, & Davis, Deborah. (2006). Recovered memories. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 469–498. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095315
Loftus, Elizabeth, & Palmer, John. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
Loftus, Elizabeth, & Pickrell, Jacqueline. (1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25, 720–725. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-19951201-07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-19951201-07
Luke, Timothy; Crozier, William, & Strange, Deryn. (2017). Memory errors in police interviews: The bait question as a source of misinformation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.011
Lynn, Steven; McNally, Richard, & Loftus, Elizabeth. (2023). The Memory Wars Then and Now: The Contributions of Scott O. Lilienfeld. Clinical Psychological Science, 11(4), 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221133034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221133034
Manzanero, Antonio. (2010). Memoria de testigos: Obtención y valoración de la prueba testifical. Pirámide.
Manzanero, Antonio, & Alvarez, Miguel Ángel. (2015). La memoria humana: Aportaciones desde la neurociencia cognitiva. Pirámide.Mendez, Mario, & Fras, Ivan. (2011). The false memory syndrome: Experimental studies and comparison to confabulations. Medical Hypotheses, 76(4), 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2010.11.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2010.11.033
Muñoz, José; González-Guerrero, Laura; Sotoca, Andrés; Terol, Odette; González, José, & Manzanero, Antonio. (2016). La entrevista forense: Obtención del indicio cognitivo en menores presuntas víctimas de abuso sexual infantil. Papeles del Psicólogo, 37(3), 205–216. https://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/2777.pdf
National Children’s Advocacy Center. (2017). Sistema de entrevistas forenses infantiles del National Children’s Advocacy Center (NCAC). https://www.nationalcac.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NCAC-Estructura-de-Entrevistas-Forenses-Infantiles-Traducci%C3%B3n-Fundaci%C3%B3n-Amparo-y-Justicia.pdf
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2012). The guidelines manual. NICE.
Offe, Heinz. (2000). El dictamen sobre la credibilidad de las declaraciones de testigos. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 10(1), 11–23. https://journals.copmadrid.org/apj/art/1ee3dfcd8a0645a25a35977997223d22
Orbach, Yael, & Lamb, Michael. (2007). Young children’s references to temporal attributes of allegedly experienced events in the course of forensic interviews. Child Development, 78(4), 1100–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01055.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01055.x
Otgaar, Henry; Howe, Mark, & Patihis, Lawrence. (2022). What science tells us about false and repressed memories. Memory, 30(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1870699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1870699
Otgaar, Henry; Howe, Mark; Patihis, Lawrence; Merckelbach, Harald; Lynn, Steven; Lilienfeld, Scott, & Loftus, Elizabeth. (2019). The return of the repressed: The persistent and problematic claims of long-forgotten trauma. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1072–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619862306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619862306
Page, Matthew J.; McKenzie, Joanne E.; Bossuyt, Patrick M.; Boutron, Isabelle; Hoffmann, Tammy C.; Mulrow, Cynthia D.; Shamseer, Larissa; Tetzlaff, Jennifer M.; Akl, Elie A.; Brennan, Sue E.; Chou, Roger; Glanville, Julie; Grimshaw, Jeremy M.; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn; Lalu, Manoj M.; Li, Tianjing; Loder, Elizabeth W.; Mayo-Wilson, Evan; McDonald, Steve; McGuinness, Luke A., & Alonso-Fernández, Sergio. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: Una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010
Peters, Micah D. J.; Marnie, Casey; Colquhoun, Heather; Garritty, Chantelle M.; Hempel, Susanne; Horsley, Tanya; Langlois, Etienne V.; Lillie, Erin; O’Brien, Kelly K.; Tunçalp, Ӧzge; Wilson, Michael G.; Zarin, Wasifa, & Tricco, Andrea C. (2021). Scoping reviews: Reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Systematic Reviews, 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3
Poder Judicial de Colombia. (2011). Sentencia T-843/11. Sala Séptima de Revisión de Tutelas de la Corte Constitucional. 8 de noviembre de 2011. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2011/T-843-11.htm#:~:text=T%2D843%2D11%20Corte%20Constitucional%20de%20Colombia&text=El%20art%C3%ADculo%2044%20superior%20reconoce,privilegiado%20en%20el%20ordenamiento%20constitucional
Poder Judicial del Perú. (2019). Protocolo de entrevista única para niñas, niños y adolescentes en cámara Gesell. https://www.pj.gob.pe/wps/wcm/connect/95de9d004ac4739fbd62fdd1306a5ccd/1-Protocolo+de++entrevista+%C3%BAnica+para+NNyA+C%C3%A1mara+Gesell%2BResoluci%C3%B3n.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=95de9d004ac4739fbd62fdd1306a5ccd
Poole, Debra, & Dickinson, Jason. (2011). Evidence supporting restrictions on uses of body diagrams in forensic interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(9), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.05.004
Presentación, José; Medina, J. P.; Soriano, L., & Muñoz, Maria del Carmen. (2014). Sistema de análisis de validez de las declaraciones (Protocolo SVA) en un caso de abusos sexuales entre menores. Descripción de criterios y su aplicación. Gaceta Internacional de Ciencias Forenses, Julio–Septiembre (12), 69–79. https://www.uv.es/gicf/5C3_Presentacion_GICF_12.pdf
Price, Eleanor; Ahern, Elizabeth, & Lamb, Michael. (2016). Rapport‐building in investigative interviews of alleged child sexual abuse victims. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 743–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3249
Raitt, Fiona, & Zeedyk, Suzanne. (1997). Psychological theory in law: Legitimating the male norm. Feminism & Psychology, 7(4), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353597074008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353597074008
Rocha, Elizabeth; Marche, Tammy, & Briere, Jennifer. (2013). The effect of forced–choice questions on children’s suggestibility: A comparison of multiple–choice and yes/no questions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028507
Ruby, Charles, & Brigham, John. (1997). The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations: A critical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3(4), 705–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.3.4.705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.3.4.705
Saywitz, Karen; Wells, Christine; Larson, Rakel, & Hobbs, Sue. (2019). Effects of interviewer support on children’s memory and suggestibility: Systematic review and meta-analyses of experimental research. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 20(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683457
Segovia, Daisy, & Crossman, Angela. (2012). Cognition and the child witness: Understanding the impact of cognitive development in forensic contexts. En Current Topics in Children’s Learning and Cognition (pp. 14–16). IntechOpen.
Sentencia T-843/11. Sala Séptima de Revisión de Tutelas de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia. 8 de noviembre de 2011. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2011/T-843-11.htm#:~:text=T%2D843%2D11%20Corte%20Constitucional%20de%20Colombia&text=El%20art%C3%ADculo%2044%20superior%20reconoce,privilegiado%20en%20el%20ordenamiento%20constitucional
Siddaway, Andy; Wood, Alex, & Hedges, Larry. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
Soleti, Emanuela; Wright, Daniel, & Curci, Antonietta. (2017). Emotional discussions reduce memory recall. Memory, 25(5), 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1206943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1206943
Szojka, Zsofia; Nicol, Annabelle; Frenguelli, Non; Rooy, David, & Henderson, Hayden. (2022). The impact of multiple interviews on the accuracy and narrative coherence of children’s memories. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(10), 980–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1984479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1984479
Takarangi, Melanie; Polaschek, Michael; Garry, Maryanne, & Loftus, Elizabeth F. (2008). Psychological science, victim advocates, and the problem of recovered memories. International Review of Victimology, 15, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800801500205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800801500205
Thorley, Craig; Dewhurst, Stephen; Abel, Joseph, & Knott, Lauren. (2016). Eyewitness memory: The impact of a negative mood during encoding and/or retrieval upon recall of a non-emotive event. Memory, 24(6), 838–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1058955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1058955
van Zyl, Llewellyn; Gaffaney, Jaclyn; van der Vaart, Leoni; Dik, Bryan, & Donaldson, Stewart. (2024). The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: A systematic review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 19(2), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956
Vara, Alba; Manzanero, Antonio, & Vallet, Rocío. (2021). Víctimas de abuso sexual especialmente vulnerables: Obtención del testimonio. Derecho & Sociedad, 57, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.18800/dys.202102.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/dys.202102.008
Volpini, Laura; Melis, Manuela; Petralia, Stefania, & Rosenberg, Melina. (2016). Measuring children’s suggestibility in forensic interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12987
Wells, Gary, & Loftus, Elizabeth. (2012). Eyewitness memory for people and events. En de Irving B. Weiner & Randy K. Otto (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (pp. 617–629). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop211025
Wixted, John, & Wells, Gary. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006166869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966
Wyman, Joshua; Foster, Ida; Crossman, Angela; Colwell, Kevin, & Talwar, Victori. (2019). The efficacy of free‐recall, cognitive load, and closed‐ended questions when children are asked to falsely testify about a crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3494
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Funding data
-
Universidad de Lima
Grant numbers PI.50.001.2022
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriela Berrocal-Aragonés, Karla Uribe-Bravo, Enrique Delgado Ramos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
