Regimes of Design, Logics of Users

Authors

  • Alex Wilkie University of London

Abstract

The following text is an edited version of the introductory chapter of my Ph.D. thesis ‘User Assemblages in Design: An Ethnographic Study’. The thesis was supervised by Mike Michael and Bill Gaver, examined by Lucy Suchman and Matthew Fuller. The degree was awarded by the University of London in October 2010. This text sets out the sociological importance and relevance for conducting an ethnography of design and users. In doing so I sketch out the rationale for the thesis, following perspectives in STS, the empirical approach I undertook as well as the research questions I pursued. Lastly, I present a chapter outline of the thesis including a brief summary of the major theoretical contribution of the thesis, namely the concept of the user-assemblage, which draws on the work of Deleuze and Guattari and contributes to developments after actor-network theory.

Keywords

User-Centered Design, Assemblage, Actor-Network Theory, Ethnography

References

Adam, Barbara (2005). Futures Told, Tamed and Traded. Retrieved 17th December 2010, from Cardiff University: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/futures/ESRC%20PF%20Futures%20TTT.pdf

Adams, Vincanne, Murphy, Michelle, & Clarke, Adele E (2009). Anticipation: Technoscience, Life, Affect, Temporality. Subjectivity, 28(1), 246-265.

Akrich, Madeleine (1992a). Beyond Social Construction of Technology: The Shaping of People and Things in the Innovation Process. In Meinolf Dierkes & Ute Hoffman (Eds.), New Technology at the Outset: Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations (pp. 173-190). Frankfurt & New York: Campus Verlag.

Akrich, Madeleine (1992b). The De-Scription of Technical Objects. In Wiebe Bijker & John Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Akrich, Madeleine (1995). User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology. In Arie Rip, Thomas J. Misa & Johan Schot (Eds.), Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment (pp. 167-184). London and New York: Pinter Publishers.

Banham, Reyner (1962). Theory and Design in the First Machine Age. London: The architectural press.

Barry, Andrew (2001). Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. Continuum International Publishing Group - Athlone Press.

Barry, Andrew (2005). Pharmaceutical Matters: The Invention of Informed Materials. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(1), 51-69.

Barry, Andrew, Born, Georgina, & Weszkalnys, Gisa (2008). Logics of Interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 37(1), 20-49.

Barry, Andrew, & Thrift, Nigel (2007). Gabriel Tarde: Imitation, Invention and Economy. Economy and Society, 36(4), 509-525.

Beck, Ulrich (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Berg, Marc (1998). The Politics of Technology: On Bringing Social Theory into Technological Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23(4), 456-490.

Beunza, Daniel, & Stark, David (2004). Tools of the Trade: The Socio-Technology of Arbitrage in a Wall Street Trading Room. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), 369-400.

Bijker, Wiebe E. (1995/1999). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Boltanksi, Luc, & Chiapello, Eve (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London; New York: Verso.

Brown, Nik (1998). Ordering Hope: Representations of Xenotransplantation – an Actor/Actant Network Theory Account. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

Brown, Nik (2003). Hope against Hype: Accountability in Biopasts, Presents and Futures. Science Studies, 16(2), 3-21.

Brown, Nik, & Kraft, Alison (2006). Blood Ties: Banking the Stem Cell Promise. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3(4), 313-327.

Brown, Nik, & Michael, Mike (2003). A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(1), 3-18.

Brown, Nik, Rappert, Brian, & Webster, Andrew Foresight as a Tool for the Management of Knowledge Flows and Innovation (Formakin): Science and Technology Studies Unit, The University of York, UK.

Callon, Michel (1986). The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan.

Callon, Michel (2004). The Role of Hybrid Communities and Socio-Technical Arrangements in the Participatory Design. Journal of the Center for Information Studies, 5, 3-10.

Callon, Michel, & Law, John (1995). Agency and the Hybrid Collectif. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 94(2), 481-507.

Callon, Michel, Méadel, Cécile, & Rabeharisoa, Vololona (2002). The Economy of Qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2), 194-217.

Cefkin, Melissa (Ed.). (2009). Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Danholt, Peter (2005). How Is User-Centered Design Interested in Users? A Posthumanist Approach. Paper presented at the IRIS - Reaching Out, Proceedings of the 28th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS), Kristiansand, Norway.

De Laat, Bastiaan (2000). Scripts for the Future: Using Innovation Studies to Design Foresight Tools. In Nik Brown, Brian Rappert & Andrew Webster (Eds.), Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science (pp. 175-208). Aldershot: Ashgate.

Deleuze, Gilles (1993). Rhizome Versus Trees. In Constantin V. Boundas (Ed.), The Deleuze Reader. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, Gilles, & Guattari, Félix (1988). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Athlone.

Deuten, Jasper, J., & Rip, Arie (2000). The Narrative Shaping of a Product Development Process. In Nik Brown, Brian Rappert & Andrew Webster (Eds.), Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science (pp. 65-86). Aldershot: Ashgate.

Dilnot, Clive (1984a). The State of Design History, Part I: Mapping the Field. Design Issues, 1(1), 4-23.

Dilnot, Clive (1984b). The State of Design History, Part Ii: Problems and Possibilities. Design Issues, 1(2), 3-20.

Dunne, Anthony (1999). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience and Critical Design. London: RCA Computer Related Design Research.

Forty, Adrian (1986). Objects of Desire: Design and Society, 1750-1980. London: Thames and Hudson.

Foucault, Michel (1975/1991). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.

Foucault, Michel (2000). What Is an Author? In James D. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology (Vol. 2, pp. 205-224). London: Penguin Books.

Frampton, Kenneth (1980). Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson.

Fuller, Peter (1988). The Search for a Postmodern Aesthetic. In John Thackara (Ed.), Design after Modernism: Beyond the Object (pp. 117-134). London: Thames and Hudson.

Garrety, Karin, & Badham, Richard (2004). User-Centered Design and the Normative Politics of Technology. Science Technology Human Values, 29(2), 191-212.

Glynne, J, Hackney, F, & Minton, V (2008). Networks of Design: Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society (Uk) University College Falmouth, 3-6 September.

Godin, Benoit (2006). The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Science Technology Human Values, 31(6), 639-667.

Halewood, M (2008). Introduction to Special Section on an Whitehead. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(4), 1.

Haraway, Donna (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.

Henderson, Kathryn (1991). Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(No. 4), 448-473.

Heskett, John (1980). Industrial Design. London: Thames & Hudson.

Hutchins, Edwin (1996). Cognition in the Wild. London: The MIT Press.

Latour, Bruno (1988a). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (1988b). Science in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (1991). Technology Is Society Made Durable. In John Law (Ed.), Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 273). London: Routledge.

Latour, Bruno (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Law, John (1994). Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lépinay, Vincent Antonin (2007). Economy of the Germ: Captial, Accumulation and Vibration. Economy and Society, 36(4), 526-548.

Lury, Celia (2004). Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy. London: Routledge.

MacKenzie, Donald A. (2006). An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, Mass. ; London: MIT.

Margolin, Victor (1997). Getting to Know the User. Design Studies, 18(3), 227-236.

Margolin, Victor (Ed.). (1989). Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.

Marres, Noortje (2009). Testing Powers of Engagement: Green Living Experiments, the Ontological Turn and the Undoability of Involvement. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 117-133.

Michael, Mike (2000a). Futures of the Present: From Performativity to Prehension. In Nik Brown, Brian Rappert & Andrew Webster (Eds.), Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science (pp. 21-39). Aldershot: Ashgate.

Michael, Mike (2000b). Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity. London: Routledge.

Mol, Annamarie (1999). Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions. In John Law & John Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and After (pp. 74-89). Oxford; Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review.

Mol, Annemarie (2003). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, N.C.; London: Duke University Press.

Molotch, Harvey (2003). Where Stuff Comes From: How Toasters, Toilets, Cars, Computers, and Many Others Things Come to Be as They Are. New York ; London: Routledge.

Mumford, Eric Paul (2000). The Ciam Discourse on Urbanism, 1928-1960. Cambridge, Mass. ; London: MIT Press.

Norman, Donald A. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. London: MIT.

Oudshoorn. Nelly. (1996) Genderscripts in technologie. Noodlot of uitdaging, Inaugural speech University of Twente.

Papanek, Victor (2006). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. London: Thames and Hudson.

Pevsner, Nikolaus (1960). Pioneers of Modern Design: From William Morris to Walter Gropius. London: Penguin Books.

Pine, B. Joseph, & Gilmore, James H. (1999). The Experience Economy : Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Rogers, Richard (2000). Preferred Placement : Knowledge Politics on the Web. Maastricht: Jan Van Eyck Akademie.

Rommes, Els, van Oost, Ellen, & Oudshoorn, Nelly (1999). Gender and the Design of a Digital City. Information Technology, Communication and Society, 2(4), 476-495.

Shove, Elizabeth, Watson, Matthew, Hand, Martin, & Ingram, Jack (2007). The Design of Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.

Sparke, Penny (2010). The Genius of Design. London: Quadrille Publishing Ltd.

Thackara, John (1988). Design after Modernism: Beyond the Object. London: Thames and Hudson.

The Department of Trade and Industry (2004). Innovation through People-Centred Design - Lessons from the USA. Report of a Dti Global Watch Mission. London: Pera Innovation Limited on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry.

Thrift, Nigel (2005). Knowing Capitalism. London: SAGE Publications.

Thrift, Nigel (2008). Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.

United Nations (2008). Creative Economy Report 2008: The Challenge of Assessing the Creative Economy Towards Informed Policy-Making: United Nations, United Nations Development Programme & United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

van Oost, Ellen (2003). Materialized Gender: How Shavers Configure Users' Femininity and Masculinity. In Nelly Oudshoorn & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter : The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies (pp. 67-80). Cambridge, Mass. ; London: MIT.

Verbeek, Peter-Paul (2005). What Things Do : Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press ; [London : Eurospan distributor].

Whiteley, Nigel (1993). Design for Society. London: Reaktion.

Whiteley, Nigel (2002). Reyner Banham: Historian of the Immediate Future. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Wilkie, Alex, & Michael, Mike (2009). Expectation and Mobilisation: Enacting Future Users. Science Technology Human Values, 34(4), 502-522.

Winner, Langdon (1986). The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.

Woodham, Jonathan M. (1997). Twentieth Century Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woodhouse, Edward, & Patton, Jason W. (2004). Design by Society: Science and Technology Studies and the Social Shaping of Design. Design Issues, 20(3), 1-12.

Woolgar, Steve (1991). Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. In John Law (Ed.), Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 57-99). London: Routledge.

Yaneva, Albena (2009). The Making of a Building: A Pragmatist Approach to Architecture. Oxford: Peter Lang AG.

Published

2011-03-08

How to Cite

Wilkie, A. (2011). Regimes of Design, Logics of Users. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento E investigación Social, 11(1), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v11n1.842

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.