El papel de la categorización como medio de preservación de la fidelidad en la transmisión cultural
Resumen
En este artículo se aborda la problemática de la identificación de los replicadores culturales y la elaboración de un modelo de replicación cultural verosímil. De acuerdo con el tipo de información que se supone objeto de replicación agrupamos los diversos modelos evolutivos de transmisión cultural en tres grandes categorías, que denominamos externalismo, internalismo y polisustratismo. De ellas, argumentamos por qué, a nuestro juicio, el internalismo es la opción más adecuada; si bien los modelos internalistas no suelen dar cuenta satisfactoriamente de cómo la información cultural puede haber alcanzado un cierto grado de fidelidad en la transmisión pese a depender de procesos individuales de inferencia intencional. Concluimos que ningún autor parece haber adoptado un modelo adecuado de categorización fundamentado en una perspectiva basada en el uso. Tal modelo implicaría una dinámica de retroalimentación en la formación de las categorías que podría permitir la depuración a posteriori del flujo de información entrante.Palabras clave
Imitación, Replicación cultural, Categorización, FidelidadCitas
Altmann, Eduardo G.; Whichard, Zakary L. & Motter, Adilson E. (2013). Identifying Trends in word frequency dynamics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 151(1-2), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0699-7
Aunger, Robert (2002). The Electric Meme: a New Theory of How we Think. New York: Free Press.
Aunger, Robert (2007). Memes. In I.M. Dunbar Robin & Barrett Louise (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 599-604). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568308.001.0001
Aunger, Robert (2006). An Agnostic View of Memes. In J. C. Wells, Simon SladeStrickland & Kevin Laland (Eds.), Social information transmission and human biology (pp. 89-96). London - New York: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005837.ch5
Bandura, Albert (1997). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Benzon, William (1996). Culture as an Evolutionary Arena. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems. 19(4) 321-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-7361(96)90003-X
Benzon, William (2013). Cultural Evolution, Memes, and the Trouble with Dan Dennett, SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2307023
Blackmore, Susan (1999). The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blackmore, Susan (2007). Imitation Makes Us Human. In Charles Pasternak (Ed.), What makes us human? (pp. 1-16). Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
Boesch, Christophe (2011). From material to symbolic cultures: Culture in primates. In Jaan Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 677-692). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.013.0032
Boyd, Robert & Richerson, Peter J. (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bybee, Joan (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711-733. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186
Chomsky, Noam (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Courage, Mary L. & Howe, Mark L. (2002). From infant to child: The dynamics of cognitive change in the second year of life. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 250–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.250
Croft, William (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Croft, William (2013a). An evolutionary model of language change and language structure. In William Croft (Ed.), Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edition (draft). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Available at: http://www.unm.edu/~wcroft/Papers/ELC2-Chap02.pdf
Croft, William (2013b). Evolution, language use and the evolution of languages. In P. M. Binder & K. Smith (Eds.), The Language Phenomenon: Human Communication from Milliseconds to Millennia (pp. 93-120). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36086-2_5
Croft, William (2015). Grammar: Functional approaches. In James D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences (2nd ed., pp. 470-475). Oxford: Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53009-8
Dawkins, Richard (1976/2006). The Selfish Gene: 30th Anniversary edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, Richard (1982/1999). The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, Richard (1986/1996). The Blind Watchmaker. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Dawkins, Richard (1999) Foreword to The Meme Machine, In S. Blackmore (Ed.), The Meme Machine (pp. VII-XVII). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, Daniel C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Donald, Merlin (2005). Imitation and Mimesis. In Susan Hurley & Nick Chater Perspectives on Imitation: Imitation, human development, and culture (vol. 2, pp. 283-300), Cambridge MS – London: MIT Press.
Gatherer, Derek (1998). Why the ‘thought contagion’ metaphor is retarding the progress of memetics. Journal of Memetics-Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission. Retrieved from: http://cfpm.org/jom-emit/1998/vol2/gatherer_d.html
Grice, Herbert P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440
Griffiths, Paul E. & Gray, Russell D. (1994). Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(6) 277-304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940982
Hodgson, Greoffrey M. & Knudsen, Thorbjørn (2010). Darwin’s Conjecture. The Search for General Principles of Social & Economic Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huth, Alexander G.; de Heer; Wendy A.; Griffiths, Thomas L.; Theunissen, Frédéric E., & Gallant, Jack L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17637
Kronfeldner, Maria (2007). Darwinism, memes, and creativity: A critique of Darwinian analogical reasoning from nature to culture. 311 f. Unpublished PhD Thesis in Philosophy, University of Regensburg. Retrieved from http://epub.uni-regensburg.de/10562/
Laland, Kevin N. & O’Brien, Michael J. (2011). Cultural niche construction: an introduction. Biological Theory, 6(3). 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0026-6
McCrohon, Luke (2012). The two-stage life cycle of cultural replicators. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 9, 149-170. https://doi.org/10.12775/v10235-011-0009-y
Medin, Douglas. L. & Schaffer, Marguerite M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning, Psychological Review, 85(3), 207-238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
Meltzoff, Andrew N. (1999). Origins of theory of mind, cognition and communication. Journal of communication disorders, 32(4), 251-269.
Müller, Ralph-Axel (2009). Language universals in the brain: How linguistic are they? In Morten H. Christiansen, Christopher Collins & Shimon Edelman (Eds.), Language Universals (pp. 224-252). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305432.003.0011
Murphy, Gregory L. (2004). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Oyama, Susan (2000). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Durham: Duke University Press.
Pérez-Rodríguez, José Henrique (2014a). Reflexiones acerca de la lengua escrita: de código sustitutivo a código adaptativo. RAEL: Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 13(1), 157-194.
Pérez-Rodríguez, José Henrique (2014b). La articulación de la expresión escrita. Ocnos: Revista de Estudios sobre Lectura, 12, 79-106. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2014.12.04
Pérez-Rodríguez, José Henrique (2015). Cultura, língua e ciclos de vida: manifestações e transmissão da informação cultural e linguística. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Piaget, Jean (1945/1976). La formation du symbole chez l’enfant: imitation, jeu et rêve, image et representation. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Ritt, Nikolaeus (2004). Selfish Sounds and Linguistic Evolution: a Darwinian Approach to Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shea, Nicholas (2011). Developmental Systems Theory Formulated as a Claim about Inherited Representations. Philosophy of Science, 78(1), 60-82. https://doi.org/10.1086/658110
Sperber, Dan & Claidière, Nicolas (2008). Defining and explaining culture (comments on Richerson and Boyd, Not by Genes Alone). Biology & Philosophy, 23(2), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9012-8
Sterelny, Kim, Smith, Kelly C. & Dickison, Michael (1996). The extended replicator. Biology and Philosophy, 11(3), 377-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128788
Tomasello, Michael (2000). Culture and Cognitive Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(2), 37-40.
Tomasello, Michael (2014). The Ultra‐social Animal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2015
Tomasello, Michael; Kruger, Anne C. & Ratner, Hillary H. (1993). Cultural Learning. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 16(3), 495-552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0003123X
Tylor, Edward B. (1871/2012). Primitive Culture. Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom (Vol. 1, online version). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511705953
Williams, George C. (1995). A Package of Information. In John Brockman (Ed.), The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution (pp. 33-50). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Wilson, Edward O. (2012). The Social Conquest of Earth. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (1984). Pragmatics: an overview. In Susan George (Ed.), From the Linguistic to the Social Context. Suggestion for Interpretation (pp 21-41). Bologna: Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2018 José Henrique Pérez Rodríguez

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
